我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 错误信息更正后的编码和提取(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2025年02期
页码:
 129-135
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2025-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Encoding and Retrieval after Correcting the Misinformation
文章编号:
1003-5184(2025)02-0129-07
作者:
 贾广珍; 刘爱心; 董及美; 陈功香
 (济南大学教育与心理科学学院,济南 250022)
Author(s):
 Jia Guangzhen;  Liu Aixin;  Dong Jimei;  Chen Gongxiang
 (School of Education and Psychology,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022)
关键词:
 错误信息持续影响效应;  重复否定更正;  直接替换更正;  间接替换更正
Keywords:
 the continued influence effect of misinformation;  the repeated negative correction;  the direct replacement correction;  the indirect replacement correction
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 通过两个实验探讨错误信息持续影响效应的心理机制,被试阅读新闻材料后对相关问题进行正误判断,从而考察有、无更正以及不同更正方式对错误信息的记忆和后续推理活动的影响。结果发现,错误信息持续影响效应不仅与编码阶段错误信息的更新不足有关,也与提取阶段更正信息的竞争失败有关,而且,错误信息和更正信息的对立冲突会影响信息的激活和提取。实验结果支持了心理模型更新的观点和选择提取模型,并且补充和拓展了选择提取模型。
Abstract:
 Two experiments were conducted to investigate the psychological mechanisms underlying the continued influence effect of misinformation.Participants read news articles and made judgments on related questions to examine how different correction methods impacted their memory of and subsequent reasoning about misinformation.The results showed that the continued influence effect of misinformation(CIEM)is linked to both insufficient updating of misinformation during encoding and the failure of retracted information to compete effectively during retrieval.Additionally,the conflict between misinformation and retracted information was found to influence the activation and retrieval of information.The findings support the model-updating account and the selective-retrieval model,while also extending and enriching the selective-retrieval model.

参考文献/References

 金花,贾丽娜,阴晓娟,严世振,魏士琳,陈俊涛.(2022).错误信息持续影响效应的神经基础.心理学报,54(4),343-355.
Ayers,M.S.,& Reder,L.M.(1998).A theoretical review of the misinformation effect:Predictions from an activation-based memory model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5,1-21.
Bertolotti,M.,& Catellani,P.(2023).Counter factual thinking as a prebunking strategy to contrast misinformation on COVID-19. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,104,104404.
Brydges,C.R.,Gordon,A.,& Ecker,U.K.(2020).Electrophysiological correlates of the continued influence effect of misinformation:An exploratory study.Journal of Cognitive Psychology,32(8),771-784.
Chan,M.P.S.,Jones,C.R.,Hall Jamieson,K.,& Albarracín,D.(2017).Debunking:A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation.Psychological Science,28(11),1531-1546.
Ecker,U.K.H.,& Antonio,L.M.(2021).Can you believe it?An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.Memory & Cognition,49,631-644.
Ecker,U.K.H.,Hogan,J.L.,& Lewandowsky,S.(2017).Reminders and repetition of misinformation:Helping or hindering its retraction?Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,6(2),185-192.
Ecker,U.K.H.,Lewandowsky,S.,Chang,E.P.,& Pillai,R.(2014).The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,20(4),323-335.
Ecker,U.K.H.,Lewandowsky,S.,Cheung,S.C.C.,& Maybery,T.M.(2015).He did it! She did it! No,she did not! Multiple causal explanations and the continued influence of misinformation.Journal of Memory and Language,85,101-115.
Ecker,U.K.H.,Lewandowsky,S.,Swire,B.,& Chang,D.(2011).Correcting false information in memory:Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,18(3),570-578.
Ecker,U.K.H.,Lewandowsky,S.,& Tang,D.T.W.(2010).Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.Memory & Cognition,38(8),1087-1100.
Ecker,U.K.H.,O’Reilly,Z.,Reid,J.S.,& Chang,E.P.(2020).The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks.British Journal of Psychology,111,36-54.
Ecker,U.K.H.,Sze,B.K.N.,& Andreotta,M.(2021).Corrections of political misinformation:No evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a U.S.convenience sample.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences,376(1822),20200145.
Gordon,A.,Brooks,J.C.,Quadflieg,S.,Ecker,U.K.,& Lewandowsky,S.(2017).Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing. Neuropsychologia,106,216-224.
Gordon,A.,Quadflieg,S.,Brooks,J.C.W.,Ecker,U.K.H.,& Lewandowsky,S.(2019).Keeping track of ‘alternative facts’:The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.NeuroImage,193,46-56.
Johnson,H.M.,& Seifert,C.M.(1994).Sources of the continued influence effect:When misinformation in memory affects later inferences.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,20(6),1420-1436.
Kendeou,P.,Walsh,E.K.,Smith,E.R.,& O’Brien,E.J.(2014).Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts.Discourse Processes,51(5-6),374-397.
Lee,J.,Lee,J.,& Min,J.(2025).The pursuit of online misinformation literacy:Understanding age-varying competence for misinformation recognition.Telematics and Informatics,97,102228.
Lin,H.,Pennycook,G.,& Rand,D.G.(2023).Thinking more or thinking differently?Using drift-diffusion modeling to illuminate why accuracy prompts decrease misinformation sharing.Cognition,230,105312.
Nyhan,B.,& Reifler,J.(2015).Displacing misinformation about events:An experimental test of causal corrections.Journal of Experimental Political Science,2(1),81-93.
Patrick,R.R.,& Maria,S.Z.(2016).The Continued Influence of Implied and Explicitly Stated Misinformation in News Reports.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,42,62-74.
Poland,G.A.,& Spier,R.(2010).Fear,misinformation,and innumerates:How the Wake field paper,the press,and advocacy groups damaged the public health.Vaccine,28(12),2361-2362.
Putnam,A.L.,Wahlheim,C.N.,& Jacoby,Larry,L.M.(2014).Memory for flip-flopping:Detection and recollection of political contradictions.Memory & Cognition,42(7),1198-1210.
Rugg,M.D.,& Curran,T.(2007).Event-related potentials and recognition memory.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11,251-257.
Seifert,C.M.(2002).The continued influence of misinformationinmemory:What makes a correction effective?The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,41,265-292.
Skurnik,I.,Yoon,C.,Park,D.C.,& Schwarz,N.(2005).How warnings about false claims become recommendations.Journal of Consumer Research,31(4),713-724.
Stadtler,M.,Scharrer,L.,Brummernhenrich,B.,& Bromme,R.(2013).Dealing With Uncertainty:Readers’ Memory for and Use of Conflicting Information From Science Texts as Function of Presentation Format and Source Expertise.Cognition and Instruction,31(2),130-150.
Swire,B.,Ecker,U.K.H.,& Lewandowsky,S.(2017).The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,43(12),1948-1961.
Toni,G.L.A.,Jin,Y.,& van der Meer.(2019).Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises:The effects of corrective information type and source.Health Communication,35(5),560-575.
Wilkes,A.L.,& Leatherbarrow,M.(1988).Editing episodic memory following the identification of error.Human Experimental Psychology,40(2),361-387.
Yonelinas,A.P.,& Jacoby,L.L.(2012).The process-dissociation approach two decades later:Convergence,boundary conditions,and new directions.Memory & Cognition,40(5),663-680.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:全国教育科学规划“十三五”规划2020年度教育部重点课题(DBA200294)。
通信作者:陈功香,E-mail:chengx@ujn.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2025-04-30