我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 清廉感知如何增强获得感?——政府回应的中介作用及数字政府的调节作用(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2025年02期
页码:
 136-142
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2025-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 How Does Integrity Perception Enhance the Sense of Gain?——The Mediating Role of Government Response and the Moderating Role of Digital Government
文章编号:
1003-5184(2025)02-0136-07
作者:
 南日; 陈虹璇
 (南京审计大学公共管理学院,南京 211815)
Author(s):
 Nan Ri;  Chen Hongxuan
 (School of Public Administration,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815)
关键词:
 反腐败;  公民获得感;  政府回应;  数字政府
Keywords:
 anti-corruption;  citizen’s sense of gain;  government response;  digital government
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 为探讨清廉感知、政府回应、公民获得感的关系以及数字政府在其中的调节作用,采用线上线下随机抽样的方法获得1137份有效问卷并对其进行分析。研究结果发现:(1)清廉感知对公民获得感的正向预测作用显著;(2)政府回应在清廉感知与公民获得感之间起中介作用,且政府回应的内部系统比外部压力的中介效应更大;(3)数字政府在清廉感知与公民获得感之间发挥调节作用。研究发现对中国在廉政建设中不断增强公民获得感的潜力发挥具有重要现实指导意义。
Abstract:
 In order to explore the relationship between the perception of integrity,government response,citizens’ sense of gain,and the moderating role of digital government,a total of 1137 valid questionnaires were obtained by online and offline random sampling.The results show that:(1)incorruptibility perception has a significant positive predictive effect on citizens’ sense of gain;(2)Government response plays a mediating role between the perception of integrity and citizens’ sense of gain,and the mediating effect of the internal system of government response is greater than that of external pressure;(3)Digital government plays a moderating role between the perception of integrity and citizens’ sense of gain.The research findings have important practical significance for China to continuously enhance the potential of citizens’ sense of gain in the construction of a clean government.

参考文献/References

 戴长征,鲍静.(2017).数字政府治理:基于社会形态演变进程的考察.中国行政管理,(9),21-27.
马亮.(2022).网上办事不求人:政府数字化转型与社会关系重塑.电子政务,(5),31-42.
南日.(2024).政策框架视角下反腐倡廉增进公众幸福感的实证研究.浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),(4),55-69.
南日.(2024).政府市场共演理论视角下清廉感知对获得感的影响机制研究.哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),(6),34-43.
倪星,许凤显.(2021).行政权力、信息公开与政府清廉度:基于韩国中央政府机关的实证研究.理论与改革,(3),102-117,156.
邵梓捷,杨良伟.(2022).“钟摆式回应”:回应性不足的一种解释:基于S市地方领导留言板的实证研究.经济社会体制比较,(1),114-122.
石力.(2022).正确把握新时代全面从严治党基本理论命题,扣好年轻干部成长成才的“第一粒扣子”.2022-6-6取自http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2022/0606/c40531-32439108.html.
汤丹丹,温忠麟.(2020).共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议.心理科学,43(1),215-223.
温忠麟,叶宝娟.(2014).中介效应分析:方法和模型发展.心理科学进展,22(5),731-745.
习近平.(2022).习近平在中共中央政治局第四十次集体学习时强调 提高一体推进“三不腐”能力和水平 全面打赢反腐败斗争攻坚战持久战.2022-6-18取自http://www.news.cn/politics/leaders/2022-06/18/c_1128753531.htm.
习近平.(2024).习近平在二十届中央纪委三次全会上发表重要讲话强调 深入推进党的自我革命 坚决打赢反腐败斗争攻坚战持久战.2024-1-8 取自 https://www.ccdi.gov.cn/toutiaon/202401/t20240108_320563.html
阳义南.(2022).获得感、公平度与国民幸福感提升:基于CGSS微观调查数据的分析.社会科学辑刊,(3),50-59.
张则行.(2015).政府责任重构与公共服务授权:回应型治理的一个分析架.福建行政学院学报,(1),29-37.
Aiken,L.S.,& West,S.G.(1991).Multiple regression:Testing and interpreting interactions.California:Sage Publications.
Bauhr,M.(2016).Need or greed?Conditions for collective action against corruption.Governance,30(4),561-581.
Binder,A.J.,& Wood,K.(2013).Becoming right:How campuses shape young conservatives.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Denisova-Schmidt,E.,Huber,M.,& Leontyeva,E.(2016).Do anti-corruption educational campaigns reach students?Evidence from two cities in Russia and Ukraine.Educational Studies Moscow,26(1),61-83.
Gauld,R.,Gray,A.,& McComb,S.(2009).How responsive is E-government?Evidence from Australia and New Zealand.Government Information Quarterly,26(1),69-74.
Johnston,M.(1998).Fighting systematic corruption:Social foundations for institutional reform.European Journal of Development Research,10(1),85-104.
Johnston,M.(1998).What can be done about entrenched corruption.In B.Pleskovic(Ed.),Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics(pp.69-90).Washington,D.C.:The World Bank.
Koufteros,X.,& Marcoulides,G.A.(2006).Product development practices and performance:A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis.International Journal of Production Economics,103(1),286-301.
Mcguire,M.,& Silvia,C.(2010).The effect of problem severity,managerial and organizational capacity,and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration:Evidence from local emergency management.Public Administration Review,70(2),279-288.
Meier,K.J.,& O’ toole,L.J.(2006).Political control versus bureaucratic values:Reframing the debate.Public Administration Review,66(2),177-192.
Mol,A.(2007).Bringing the environmental state back in:Partnerships in perspective.In P.Glasbergen(Ed.),Partnerships,governance and sustainable development:Reflections on theory and practice,Cheltenham and Northampton(pp.214-236).MA:Edward Elgar.
Nam,T.(2018).Examining the Anti-corruption Effect of E-government and the Moderating Effect of National Culture:A Cross-country Study.Government Information Quarterly,35(2),273-282.
Paek,H.,& Hove,T.(2019).Mediating and moderating roles of trust in government in effective risk rumor management:A test case of radiation-contaminated seafood in South Korea. Risk Analysis,39(12),2653-2667.
Theobald,N.A.,& Haider-markel,D.P.(2008).Race,bureaucracy,and symbolic representation:Interactions between citizens and police.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,19(2),409-426.
Yang,K.,& Callahan,K.(2007).Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness.Public Administration Review,66(1),114-126.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目(20CMZ032)。
通信作者:南日,E-mail:270363@nau.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2025-04-30