我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 流畅性还是信念?——学习判断的加工机制(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2025年03期
页码:
 220-225
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2025-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Fluency or Belief?The Processing Mechanism of Judgements of Learning
文章编号:
1003-5184(2025)03-0220-06
作者:
 段亚杰; 孙亚茹; 尹元花; 孙 影; 陈 宁; 刘 伟*
 (上海师范大学心理学院,上海 200234)
Author(s):
 Duan Yajie; Sun Yaru; Yin Yuanhua; Sun Ying; Chen Ning; Liu Wei
 (College of Psychology,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234)
关键词:
 学习判断;  元记忆;  加工流畅性;  分析加工理论
Keywords:
 Judgments of Learning(JOLs);  metamemory;  processing fluency;  analytical processing theory
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 学习判断是对当前学习项目在之后记忆测验中记住可能性的前瞻性预测,是个体基于内部线索、外部线索以及记忆线索进行推论的过程。“线索利用模型”给出了影响学习判断的三类线索,已有对不同线索作用机制的研究结果,呈现出直接线索——流畅性和信念分化——量化整合的发展脉络。未来研究应关注学习判断过程是否存在流畅性和信念的灵活配置和转换及相应策略,并借助定向遗忘、错误记忆和协作记忆等的研究范式,从多种记忆任务结果为学习判断的认知机制提供新的解释视角。
Abstract:
 Judgments of learning(JOLs)refers to the prospective predictions of the likelihood of remembering studied materials in a subsequent memory test.It is a process in which individuals make inferences based on intrinsic,extrinsic,and mnemonic cues.The “cue-utilization model” gives three types of cues that for JOLs and previous research on the mechanism of different cues has shown a development trend of direct cues——fluency and belief differentiation——quantitative integration.The future research should focus on whether there are flexible configurations and transitions of fluency and beliefs and the corresponding strategies in JOLs.Research paradigms such as directed forgetting,false memory,and collaborative memory can be used to provide new explanatory perspective on the cognitive mechanism of JOLs from the results of multiple memory tasks.

参考文献/References

 陈功香,傅小兰.(2004).学习判断及其准确性.心理科学进展,12(2),176-184.
陈功香,乔福强,赵佳.(2016).延时间隔和线索类型对遗忘学习判断的影响.心理与行为研究,14(4),433-437.
陈颖,李锋盈,李伟健.(2019).个体关于加工流畅性的信念对字体大小效应的影响.心理学报,51(2),154-162.
贾宁,白学军,沈德立.(2006).学习判断准确性的研究方法.心理发展与教育,22(3),103-109.
贾宁,魏琳,代景华.(2019).学习判断的框架效应:加工流畅性的影响.心理与行为研究,17(6),729-735.
姜英杰,杨玲,严燕.(2013).学习次数和材料难度对学习判断绝对准确性的影响.心理发展与教育,29(6),625-630.
寇东晓,顾文涛.(2021).定向遗忘的编码加工机制.心理科学进展,29(9),1599-1606.
李锋盈,陈颖,欧阳林,李伟健.(2017).重量对元认知监控的无意识影响.心理科学,40(5),1026-1032.
王景玉,曲可佳.(2018).学习判断的线索利用模型及其潜在机制.心理技术与应用,6(10),629-640.
王倩玉,刘岩.(2019).词频和运动流畅性对学习判断的影响:多线索整合的视角.心理科学,42(3),536-542.
张振新,明文.(2012).元记忆监测研究的横向比较.心理科学,35(5),1102-1106.
赵文博,姜英杰,王志伟,胡竞元.(2020).编码强度对字体大小效应的影响.心理学报,52(10),1156-1167.
Alter,A.L.,& Oppenheimer,D.M.(2009).Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation.Personality and Social Psychology Review,13(3),219-235.
Begg,I.,Duft,S.,Lalonde,P.,Melnick,R.,& Sanvito,J.(1989).Memory predictions are basedon ease of processing.Journal of Memory and Language,28(5),610-632.
Benjamin,A.S.,Bjork,R.A.,& Schwartz,B.L.(1998).The mismeasure of memory:When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,127(1),55-68.
Besken,M.,& Mulligan,N.W.(2014).Perceptual fluency,auditory generation,and metamemory:Analyzing the Perceptual Fluency Hypothesis in the auditory modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology.Learning,Memory and Cognition,40(2),429-440.
Hourihan,K.,Fraundorf,S.,& Benjamin,A.(2017).The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall.Memory and Cognition,45(1),121-136.
Hu,X.,Li,T.,Zheng,J.,Su,N.,Liu,Z.,& Luo,L.(2015).How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?PLoS ONE,10(10),1-11.
Hu,X.,Liu,Z.,Li,T.,& Luo,L.(2016).Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.Memory,24(3),383-398.
Hu,X.,Zheng,J.,Su,N.,Fan,T.,& Luo,L.(2021).A bayesian inference model for metamemory.Psychological Review,128(5),824-855.
Janes,J.L.,Rivers,M.L.,& Dunlosky,J.(2018).The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance:Positive,negative,or both?Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,25(2),1-9.
Jang,Y.,Wallsten,T.S.,& Huber,D.E.(2012).A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition.Psychological Review,119(1),186-200.
Koriat,A.(1993).How do we know that we know?The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.Psychological Review,100,609-639.
Koriat,A.(1997).Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study:A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology.General,126(4),349-349.
Koriat,A.(2007).Metacognition and consciousness.In P.D.Zelazo,M.Moscovitch,& E.Thompson(Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of consciousness(pp.289-325).New York:Cambridge University Press.
Koriat,A.,Sheffer,L.,& Ma’ayan,H.(2002).Comparing objective and subjective learning curves:Judgment of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology.General,131(2),147-162.
Li,P.,Jia,X.,Li,X.,& Li,W.(2016).The effect of animacy on metamemory.Memory and Cognition,44(5),696-705.
Li,T.,Hu,X.,Zheng,J.,Su,N.,Liu,Z.,& Luo,L.(2017).The influence of visual mental imagery size on metamemory accuracy in judgment of learning.Memory,25(2),244-253.
Metcalfe,J.,Schwartz,B.L.,& Joaquim,S.G.(1993).The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,19(4),851.
Mueller,M.L.,& Dunlosky,J.(2017).How beliefs can impact judgments of learning:Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency.Journal of Memory and Language,93,245-258.
Mueller,M.L.,Dunlosky,J.,& Tauber,S.K.(2016).The effect of identical word pairs on people’s metamemory judgments:What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,69(4),781-799.
Mueller,M.L.,Dunlosky,J.,Tauber,S.K.,& Rhodes,M.G.(2014).The font-size effect on judgments of learning:Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory?Journal of Memory and Language,70,1-12.
Mueller,M.,Tauber,S.,& Dunlosky,J.(2013).Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,20(2),378-384.
Nelson,T.O.,& Narens,L.(1994).Why investigate metacognition?In J.Metcalfe & A.P.Shimamura(Eds.),Metacognition:Knowing about knowing(pp.1-25).Cambridge,MA,US:The MIT Press.
Rhodes,M.G.,& Castel,A.D.(2008).Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information:Evidence for meta-cognitive illusions.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,137(4),615-625.
Schreiber,T.A.(1998).Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cues recall:Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.Memory and Cognition,26,553-571.
Undorf,M.,& Erdfelder,E.(2015).The relatedness effect on judgments of learning:A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.Memory and Cognition,43(4),647-658.
Undorf,M.,Zimdahl,M.F.,& Bernstein,D.M.(2017).Perceptual fluency contributes to effects of stimulus size on judgments of learning.Journal of Memory and Language,92,293-304.
Witherby,A.,& Tauber,S.(2017).The concreteness effect on judgments of learning:Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.Memory and Cognition,45(4),639-650.
Yang,C.,Huang,T.S.-T.,& Shanks,D.R.(2018).Perceptual fluency affects judgments of learning:The font size effect.Journal of Memory and Language,99,99-110.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 通信作者:刘伟,E-mail:liuwei@shnu.edu.cn; 陈宁,E-mail:chenning@shnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2025-06-20