我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 分心刺激条件下4～6岁儿童类比推理的发展及执行功能的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2025年05期
页码:
 428-434
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2025-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Analogical Reasoning Development in 4- to 6-Year-Olds Under Distracting Conditions:The Role of Executive Function
文章编号:
1003-5184(2025)05-0428-07
作者:
 沈佳鑫1; 费广洪2; 3; 舒慧4
 (1.东莞市横沥镇第二小学,东莞 523460; 2.广东白云学院教育学院,广州 510450; 3.深圳大学教育学部,深圳 518060; 4.深圳市福田区美莲小学,深圳 518000)
Author(s):
 Shen Jiaxin1; Fei Guanghong2; 3; Shu Hui4
 (1.Hengli Town Second Primary School,Dongguan 523460; 2.School of Education,Guangdong Baiyun University,Guangzhou 510450; 3.Faculty of Education,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060; 4.Meilian Primary School,Futian District,Shenzhen 518000)
关键词:
 4～6岁儿童;  知觉分心;  语义分心;  执行功能;  类比推理发展
Keywords:
 4-to 6-year-old children;  perceptual distractor;  semantic distractor;  executive function;  analogical reasoning development
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 本研究采用同时含有知觉和语义分心的类比推理任务和测查执行功能的白天黑夜Stroop任务、数字顺背和倒背任务、维度变化卡片分类任务,对223名4～6岁儿童进行测试,旨在考察在两种分心刺激同时存在时4～6岁儿童类比推理的发展特点,类比推理受两种分心刺激影响的年龄发展模式和执行功能三个子成分对类比推理影响的机制。结果发现:4～6岁儿童的类比推理存在年龄差异,5.5岁儿童的类比推理能力显著提高; 知觉分心更能影响4～6岁儿童的类比推理,5.5岁后知觉分心对儿童类比推理的影响显著降低; 执行功能的认知灵活性和工作记忆成分都与类比推理显著正相关,并对类比推理都有显著的预测作用。
Abstract:
 This study was to explore the developmental characteristics of analogical reasoning in children aged 4 to 6 years under the simultaneous influence of two types of distraction stimuli,examining the age-related patterns of analogical reasoning affected by these stimuliand to explore how executive function affect children’s analogical reasoning ability.A total of 223 children aged 4 to 6 years were tested by day-night Stroop task,digit forward and backward task,dimension card sorting task and analogy task.Results showed that there were age differences in the analogical reasoning development of children aged 4 to 6 years,and the ability of analogical reasoning of 5.5-year-old children was significantly improved.Children aged 4 to 6 years were more susceptible to perceptual distractor comparing to semantic distractor.After 5.5 years of age,the influence of perceptual distractor on children’s analogical reasoning was significantly reduced.The cognitive flexibility and working memory of executive function were significantly positively correlated with analogical reasoning,and had a significant predictive effect on analogical reasoning.

参考文献/References

 白学军,臧传丽,王丽红.(2007).推理与工作记忆.心理科学进展,(1),16-21.
陈逸群,于晓,陈英和,党茜茜,韩敏,侯江文.(2020).儿童类比推理的影响因素及干预促进.心理科学,(2),386-392.
杜雪松,王爱平.(2017).不同回避动机强度的消极情绪对类比推理的影响.心理与行为研究,15(1),69-74.
冯廷勇,李宇,李红,苏缇,龙长权.(2006).3～5岁儿童表面与结构相似性类比推理的实验研究.心理科学,29(5),1091-1095.
顾本柏,冯廷勇,袁文萍,马晓清.(2011).3～5岁幼儿在主题-规则冲突条件下的类比推理.心理发展与教育,27(2),127-132.
高敏.(2009).不同推理能力的小学生执行功能的研究(硕士学位论文).苏州大学,苏州.
郝嘉佳,陈英和,陈艺萍,白学军.(2017).工作记忆和类比推理与初一年级学生数学成绩的关系:有调节的中介效应.心理与行为研究,(4),495-499.
李媛媛.(2010).4～7岁儿童执行功能的发展及其与相关影响因素关系的研究(硕士学位论文).辽宁师范大学,沈阳.
马晓清,冯廷勇,李宇,李红.(2008).从知觉分心任务看儿童类比推理能力的发展.心理学报,40(9),987-993.
皮亚杰著.(1990).发生认识论(范祖珠 译,pp.145-160).北京:商务印书馆.
王雨函,李红,莫雷,金花,陈琳,乔佳佳.(2012).熟悉主题说明文阅读推理加工的认知神经机制.心理学报,44(11),1443-1453.
游漫.(2019).自动化专业学生认知灵活性对图形推理的影响研究(硕士学位论文).天津职业技术师范大学,天津.
于晓,王红梅,陈英和,刘瑞曙,韩瑽瑽,韩敏,刘静.(2020).分心抑制和关系整合对学前儿童类比推理的影响.心理发展与教育,(4),385-393.
杨玉英.(1983).3～7岁儿童推理过程发展的初步研究.心理科学通讯,(1),30-38,66.
张莉,辛自强,古丽扎伯克力.(2010).5～9岁儿童在不同复杂性任务上类比推理的发展特点.心理发展与教育,26(6),584-591.
Chuderska,A.,& Chuderski,A.(2014).Two facets of cognitive control in analogical mapping:The role of semantic interference resolution and goal-driven structure selection.Thinking & Reasoning,20(3),352-371.
Diamond,A.(2013).Executive functions.Annual Review of Psychology,64(1),135-168.
Gentner,D.(1983).Structure-mapping:A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,7(2),155-170.
Gentner,D.,& Medina,J.(1998).Similarity and the development of rules.Cognition,65(2),263-297.
Gentner,D.,& Rattermann,M.J.(1991).Language and the career of similarity.Perspectives on Language and Thought:Lnterrelations in Development,225.
Glady,Y.,French,R.M.,& Thibaut,J.P.(2017).Children’s failure in analogical reasoning tasks:A problem of focus of attention and information integration?Frontiers in Psychology,8,1-13.
Goswami,U.,& Brown,A.L.(1989).Melting chocolate and melting snowmen:Analogical reasoning and causal relations.Cognition,35,69-95.
Kuncel,N.R.,Hezlett,S.A.,& Ones,D.S.(2004).Academic performance,career potential,creativity,and job performance:Can one construct predict them all?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86(1),148-161.
Lavric,A.,Rippon,G.,& Forstmeier,S.(1998).ERP study of working memory in reasoning tasks.International Journal of Psychophysiology,30,95-271.
Meiser,T.,Klauer,K.C.,& Naumer,B.(2001).Propositional reasoning and working memory:The role of prior training and pragmatic content.Acta Psychologica,106(3),303-327.
Monsell,S.(1996).Control of mental processes.Unsolved mysteries of the mind:Tutorial essays in cognition.In V.Bruce(Ed.),Control of mental processes(pp.93-148).IEEE.
Richland,L.E.,Morrison,R.G.,& Holyoak,K.J.(2006).Children’s Development of Analogical Reasoning:Insights from Scene Analogy Problems.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,94(3),249-273.
Richland,L.E.,& Burchinal,M.R.(2013).Early Executive Function Predicts Reasoning Development.Psychological Science,24(1),87-92.
Simms,N.K.,Frausel,R.R.,& Richland,L.E.(2018).Working memory predicts children’s analogical reasoning.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,166,160-177.
Starr,A.,Vendetti,M.S.,& Bunge,S.A.(2018).Eye movements provide insight into individual differences in children’s analogical reasoning strategies.Acta Psychologica,186,18-26.
Thibaut,J.P.,& French,R.M.(2016).Analogical reasoning,control and executive functions:A developmental investigation with eye-tracking.Cognitive Development,38,10-26.
Vendetti,M.S.,Starr,A.,Johnson,E.L.,Modavi,K.,& Bunge,S.A.(2017).Eye movements reveal optimal strategies for analogical reasoning.Frontiers in Psychology,8,932.
Zelazo,P.D.,& Muller,U.(2002).Executive function in typical and atypical development.In U.Goswami(Ed.),Handbook of childhood cognitive development(pp.445-469).Oxford:Blackwell.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 通信作者:费广洪,E-mail:522769749@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2025-10-20