我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 解题反思对数学学业优差生解题过程的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2007年27卷02期
页码:
 58
栏目:
 学校心理学
出版日期:
 2007-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 How Reflection Influence the Mathematic-problem Solving of High-mathematic-level-students and Low-mathematic-level-students
作者:
 张 王景12林崇德1沃建中1
 1.北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京100875;2.江西师范大学教育学院,南昌330027
Author(s):
 Zhang Jing Ling Chongde Wo Jianzhong
 1.Institute of Developmental Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875; 2.Eductation College ,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022
关键词:
 解题反思解题结果解题策略数学学业优生数学学业差生
Keywords:
 reflectionperformance in mathematic -problemmathematic -strategyhigh-level -students low-level -students 2
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 考察解题反思对数学学业优生和差生解题结果及所用策略的不同影响。选取初一至 初三年级的数学学业优生和差生为被试,以一套连加数问题为实验材料,进行一对一的测试,前后 进行两次测试。对反思组优差生(优生12人,差生10人)和无反思组优差生(优生14人,差生14 人)解题过程的比较,发现:1)解题后立即进行反思能够提高差生的解题正确率,但是延长解题时 间;2)先前的解题反思对优生和差生后续解题时的正确率和解题时间均不产生明显影响;3)解题 后立即进行反思能够促进优生和差生使用高效策略,放弃低效策略;4)先前的解题
Abstract:
 This article explored that reflectioninduced the different influence onthe high-mathematic -level -students and low-mathematic -level -students duringthe mathematic -problems solving process .The high -level -students and low-level -students coming from7-9 grades took part inthe one -to -one mathematic test which composed by aseries of connect -addition-mathematic problems .After a week,all the participants took part the same test again.We comparedthe problem-solving processes inthe experi mental group(12high-level -students , 10low-level -students)and the control group(14high-level -students ,14low-level -students),and the results indicated :(1)the reflec— tionfollowing withthe low-level -students’problem-solving was benefit to their preciseness ,and prolongedtheir reactionti me ;(2)inthe af— terward problem-solving process ,the influence onthe whole experi mental group were muchless significant ;(3)reflection helpedthe experi men— tal groupto graspthe high-efficient -strategy and abandonthe low-efficient -strategy;(4)reflection helped the students to grasp the high- efficient -strategy continuously,and muchi mprovement was found in high-level -students thaninlow-level -students .

参考文献/References

 1 Desoete Annemie ,Roeyers Herbert ,Buysse Ann.Metacognition and mathematical problemsolvingin grade 3.Journal of Learn— ing Disabilities ,2001,34(5):435-449.
2 Schoenfeld A H.Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving.In:Resnick LB,Klopfer LE,Eds .Toward the think— ing curriculum:current cognitive research.Alexandria,VA: Associationfor Supervision and CurriculumDevelopment ,1989. 83-103.
3 Brian A Bottge .Reconceptualizing mathematics problemsolving forlow-achieving students .Remedial and Special Education, 2001,22(2):102-112.
4 Teong SK.The effect of metacognitive training on mathematical word -problemsolving .Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 2003,19:46-55.
5 Franziska Perels ,Tina Gurtler ,Bernhard Schmitz.Training of self -regulatory and problem-solving competence .Learning and Instruction,2005,15:123-139.
6 董奇,周勇,陈红兵.自我监控与智力.第1版.杭州:浙江 人民出版社,1996.
7 沃建中.小学数学教学心理学.第1版.北京:北京教育出 版社,2001.
8 Carol Copple .Fostering young children’s representation,plan— ning ,and reflection:a focus in three current early childhood models .Applied Developmental Psychology,2003,24:763- 771.
9 John Dewey.Howwe think—arestatement ofthe relation of re— flective thinkingto the educative process .NY :D.C.heath and company,1933.
10 Gerard van den Boom,Fred Pass roen JG,van Merrienboer , et al ..Reflection prompts and tutor feedbackin a web -based learning environment :effects on students’self -regulated learning competence .Computers in Human Behavior ,2004, 20:551-567.
11 Epstein AS.Howplanning and reflection develop young chil— dren’s thinking skills .Young Children,2003,8(5):28-36.
12 陈力.数学教学要注重引导学生“反思”.教学与管理, 2002,26:41-43.
13 陈仁胜.运用解题反思,优化数学思维能力.数学通报, 2002,9:25-28.
14 李峰.5-10岁儿童加法策略发展及个体差异研究.硕士 论文.北京:北京师范大学,2002.
15 Shrager J,Siegler R S.SCADS:a model of children’s strategy choices and strategy discoveries .Psychological Science ,1998, 9(5):405-410.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项基金项目(200209)。 通讯作者:林崇德,E-mail :linchongde @263.net。
更新日期/Last Update:  2009-01-17