我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 责任心的多元研究与测量(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2008年28卷03期
页码:
 14
栏目:
 理论心理学
出版日期:
 2008-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Multiple Approaches and Measures of Responsibility
作者:
 李明
 南京师范大学 教育科学学院，南京 210097
Author(s):
 Li Min
 School of Educational Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097
关键词:
 责任心; 尽责性; 当责; 测量; 三侧面模型
Keywords:
 responsibility;  conscientiousness;  accountability;  measure;  three-facet model
分类号:
 B8409
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 责任心研究理论背景的多元性，决定了其测量方法和研究结果的多元特征。文章介绍了心理动力学、人格心理学领域和社会认知等不同领域的责任心测量探索；并对责任心测量方法的发展做了整理，如责任心的自评与他评测量、个体与团队水平测量、经典与项目反应理论测量和外显测量与内隐测量；最后根据责任心三侧面的理论构想，讨论了责任心测量的未来发展。
Abstract:
 Studies on responsibility varied in many aspects, such as theoretical backgrounds, measuring methods, and results. This article introduced measures of responsibility derived from different areas as well as developed in different forms. A more comprehensive model of three facets of responsibility was also proposed to guide the devepment of measures of responsibility.

参考文献/References

 1　Chernyshenko O S.Applications of ideal point approaches to scale construction and scoring in personality measurement:The development of a six-faceted measure of conscientiousness.Ph.D.dissertation.2002.
2　Winter D G,Barenbaum N B.Responsibility and the power motive in women and men.Journal of Personality,1985,53:335-355.
3　Winter D G.Scoring scoring system for responsibility.Unpublished Manual for Responsibility,1998,1-2.
4　Winter D G.A motivational model of leadership: Predicting long-term management success from TAT measures of power motivation and responsibility.The Leadership Quarterly 1991,2(2):67-80.
5　Winter D G,Barenbaum N B.Responsibility and the power motive in women and men.Journal of Personality,1985,53:335-355.
6　McCrae R R,Costa P T.A Five-Factor Theory of personality.In:L.A.Pervin,O.P.John.Eds.Handbook of Personality Psychology. New York: Guilford,1999.139-153.
7　Roberts B W,Wood D,Smith J L.Evaluating five factor theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development.Journal of Research in Personality,2005,39:166-184.
8　Hofstee W K B,de Raad B,Goldberg L R.Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,63:146-163.[JP]
9　Roberts B W,Chernyshenko O S,Stark S,et al..The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on Seven Major Personality Questionnaires.Personnel Psychology,2005,58(1):103-139.
10　Garner B M.Preliminary studies of a measure of conscientiousness.Ph.D.dissertation.United States: George Fox University, 2003.
11　Wood J A,Winston B E.Toward a new understanding of leader accountability defining a critical construct.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,2005,11(3):84-95.
12　Wood J A,Winston B E.Development of three scales to measure leader accountability.Leadership & Organization Development Journal,2007,28(2):167-185.
13　Wagerman S A,Funder D C.Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement A case for conscientiousness.Journal of Research in Personality,2007,41(1):221-229.
14　English A,Griffith R L,Steelman L A.Team performance: The effect of team conscientiousness and task type.Small Group Research,2004,35(6): 643-665.
15　朱宁宁，张厚粲.CTT与IRT方法对人格测验结果处理的比较研究.心理学探新,2003,3:48-51.
16　Chernyshenko O S.Applications of ideal point approaches to scale construction and scoring in personality measurement: The development of a six-faceted measure of conscientiousness.Ph.D.Dissertation.University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign,2002.
17　郭庆科,苗金凤,王昭.IRT 展开模型及对非累积反应机制的检测.心理学探新,2006,26(1):66-78.
18　Chernyshenko O S,Stark S,Drasgow F,et al..Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures.Psychological Assessment,2007, 19(1):88-106.
19　Steffens M C.Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking? Experimental Psychology,2004,51:165-179.
20 　明，杜建政.基于反应时的人格内隐测量及其方法学的思考.心理科学进展,2008,16(1):184-191.
21　Steffens M C,Schulze Knig S.Predicting spontaneous Big-Five behaviour with Implicit Association Tests.European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2006,22:13-20.
22　Grumm M,von Collani G.Measuring Big-Five personality dimensions with the implicit association test – Implicit personality traits or self-esteem.Personality & Individual Differences,2007,43(8):2205-2217.
23　Greenwald A G.Method for measuring strength of associations of multidimensional traits.US,2007.Epstein S.Cognitive-expericntial self-theory of personality.In:T.Millon,M.J.Lemer.Eds.Handbook of Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology.New York:Wiley,2003,5:159-184.
25　Schlenker B R,Britt T W,Pennington J,et al..The triangle model of responsibility.Psychological Review,1994,101(4):632-652.
26　Resick C J,Baltes B B,Shantz C Walker.Person-organization fit and work-related attitudes and decisions: Examining interactive effects with job fit and conscientiousness.Journal of Applied Psychology,2007, 92(5):1446-1455.
27　Warton P M，Goodnow J J.The nature of responsibility: Children’s understanding of “your job”.Child Development,1991,(62):156-165.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目：国家社会科学基金教育学2007年重点项目（BEA07007）
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01