我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 7~9岁儿童失言理解与执行功能的关系(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2008年28卷03期
页码:
 23
栏目:
 学校与认知心理学
出版日期:
 2008-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Relationship between Faux Pas Understanding and Executive Function in 7- to 9-year-olds
作者:
 王异芳1; 2; 苏彦捷1
 1.北京大学 心理学系，北京 100871；2.首都师范大学 心理学系，北京 100037
Author(s):
 Wang Yifang1; 2 ;  Su Yanjie1
 1.Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871；2.Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037
关键词:
 心理理论; 失言理解; 执行功能; 抑制－转换能力; 计划能力
Keywords:
 theory of mind;  faux pas understanding;  executive function;  inhibition-shift ability;  plan ability
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 为了说明学龄儿童心理理论与执行功能的关系，研究采用失言理解、威斯康星卡片分类和汉诺塔任务分别考察了90名7~9岁儿童的心理理论和执行功能。结果表明，失言理解与抑制－转换能力相关显著（r=0.34, p<0.01），但是与计划能力相关不显著（r=0.06, p>0.05）。在控制年龄后，失言理解与抑制－转换能力的相关仍然显著（r=0.29, p< 0.05）。研究结果说明，学龄儿童心理理论与执行功能的相关模式与学龄前儿童完全一致，提示心理理论与执行功能的相关关系从学龄前延续到了学龄阶段。
Abstract:
 To illuminate the relationship between theory of mind and executive function after passing the false belief task, Faux pas tasks, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Tower of Hanoi tasks were used to explore theory of mind and executive function in 90 chidren of 7 to 9 years olds. The results showed the scores on faux pas tasks correlated significantly with the performances on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (r=0.34, p<0.01), but not on Hanoi tasks (r=0.06, p>0.05). Significant partial correlations (age controlled) also existed between faux pas understanding and inhibition-shift ability (r=0.29, p<0.05).The pattern of relationship between theory of mind and executive function in children of school age was the same to that in preschoolers. These results suggested that the correlation between theory of mind and executive function might extend from preschoolers to children of school age.

参考文献/References

 1　Premack D，Woodruff G.Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1978,1(4):515-526.
2　Hughes C.Finding your marbles: does preschooler’s strategic behavior predict later understanding of mind? Developmental Psychology,1998,34(6):1326-1339.
3　Carlson S M，Moses L J.Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind.Child Development,2001,72(4):1032-1053.
4　Carlson S M，Moses L J，Claxton L J.Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,2004,87(3):299-319.
5　Flynn E，O’Malley C，Wood D.A longitudinal, microgenetic study of the emergence of false belief understanding and inhibition skills.Developmental Science,2004,7(1):103-115.
6　Hughes C，Ensor R.Executive function and theory of mind:Predictive relations from 2 to 4.Development Psychology,2007,43(6):1447-1459.
7　McKinnon M C，Moscovitch M.Domain-general contribu-tions to social Theory of mind and self-control: More than a common problem of inhibition.Child Development,2007,73(3):752-767.
8　Moses L J.Executive accounts of theory-of-mind devel-opment.Child Development,2001,72(3):688-690.
9　Leslie A M，Friedman O，German T P.Core mechanisms in theory of mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2004,8(12):528-533.
10　赵红梅，苏彦捷.学龄后心理理论的持续发展——从“获得”到“使用”的转变.心理学探新,2006,26(2),22-25.
11　Baron-Cohen S，O’Riordan M，Stone V，et al.. Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder,1999,29(5):407-418.
12　Stone V E，Baron-Cohen S，Calder A，et al. .Acquired theory of mind impairments in individuals with bilateral amygdala lesions.Neuropsychologia,2003,41(2):209-220.
13　Gioia G A，Isquith P K，Guy S C.Assessment of executive functions in children with neurological impairment.In:Simeonsson R J，Rosenthal S L.Eds.Psychological and developmental assessment: Children with disabilities and chronic conditions. Guilford Press,New York,2001.317-350.
14　Moses L J，Carlson S M.，Sabbagh M A.On the specificity of the relation between executive function and children’s theory of mind.In:Schneider W，Schumann-Hengsteler R,Sodian B.Eds.Young children’s cognitive development:Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind.Mahwah N J：Erlbaum,2005,131-146. 
15　Gallagher H L，Frith C D.Dissociable neural pathways for the perception and recognition of expressive and instrumental gestures.Neuropsychologia,2004,42(13):1725-1736.
16　Siegal M，Varley R.Neural systems involved in ‘theory of mind’.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2002,3(6):463-471. 17　Stuss D T，Gallup G G. Jr，Alexander M P. The frontal lobes are necessary for "theory of mind." Brain,2001,124(2):279-286.
18　Bara B G，Bucciarelli M，Colle L. Communicative abilities in autism: Evidence for attentional deficits. Brain and Language,2001,77(2):216-240.
19　Baron-Cohen S，Leslie A M，Frith U. Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’？Cognition,1985,21(4):37-46.
20　Hill E L. Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2004,8(1):26-32.
21　Joseph R M，Tager-Flusberg H. The relationship of theory of mind and executive functions to symptom type and severity in children with autism.Development and Psychopathology,2004,16(2):137-155.
22　Pellicano E. Links between theory of mind and executive function in young children with autism: Clues to developmental Primacy.Developmental Psychology,2007,43(4):974-990.
23　王异芳，苏彦捷.从心理理论与执行功能的关系看孤独症. 心理科学进展，2004，12（5）：737-742.
24　Baron-Cohen S，O’Riordan M，Stone V，et al. Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder,1999,29(5):407-418.
25　Baron-Cohen S.Does the study of autism justify minimalist innate modularity? Learning and Individual Differences,1998,10(3):179-191

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（30770728），北京市自然科学基金项目（7072036）。通讯作者：苏彦捷，E-mail: yjsu@pku.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01