我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 情境事件、关系取向与人际关系满意感的关系(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2008年28卷03期
页码:
 88
栏目:
 社会与人格心理学
出版日期:
 2008-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Contextual Incidents, Interpersonal Orientation and Interpersonal Satisfaction
作者:
 赵菊 佐斌
 华中师范大学 心理学院，武汉 430079
Author(s):
 Zhao Ju　Zuo Bin
 Psychology College, Centual China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
关键词:
 关系满意感; 情境事件; 关系取向
Keywords:
 interpersonal satisfaction;  contextual incidents;  interpersonal orientation
分类号:
 B849
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 该文采用问卷方法探讨了情境事件、情绪和关系取向与人际关系满意感的关系。研究结果显示，年龄、性别和职业均影响着人们对关系满意感两个维度的评价。消极事件直接影响个体对关系不满意维和满意维的评价，导致个体的不满意感产生，而积极事件则只能通过情绪间接的影响着个体对关系的评价。关系缘分观能够解释人际关系满意感。结论：情境事件和关系取向均影响着人们对自身人际关系满意感的评价。
Abstract:
 Proceeding from China’s native culture, the research will penetrate into the relationship among contextual incidents, interpersonal orientation and interpersonal satisfaction by the questionnaire method.The main conclusion got in this research is as follows: first, Gender, age and career are all influencing individual’s appraisal on the relationship; second, Passive incidents, directly or through emotion, can influence the appraisal that individuals are unsatisfied with the interpersonal relationship, which lead to individual unsatisfied; The positive incidents, only through emotion, can influence individual’s appraisal indirectly;last, Relationship orientation and satisfied dimension present the prominent positive correlation, which proves that the higher the individual relationship orientation is, the more satisfied with the relationship he inclines to be.

参考文献/References

 1Fine Mark A.Advances in understanding relationship satisfaction.Contemporary Psychology:A Journal of Reviews,1998,43(8):549-550.
2Thibaut J W,Kelley H H.The social psychology of groups.New York:Wiley,1959.
3赵菊，佐斌.情境与互动：人际互倚及其模式.心理科学进展，2005(6):828-835.
4Hill C T,Stull D E.Sex differences in effects of social and value similarity in same-sex friendships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1981,41:488-502.
5Phaf R.Hans,Rotteveel Mark.Affective modulation of recognition bias.Emotion,2005,5(3):309-318.
6赵菊.抑郁的人际模式—人格、人际情境与抑郁.心理发展与教育，2005,(1):100-103.
7Rusbult C E,Van Lange P A M.Interdependence,interaction,and relationships.The Annual Review of Psychology,2003,54:351-375.
8杨国枢.中国人的社会取向：社会互动的观点.见：杨国枢.主编.中国人的心理与行为：本土化研究.台湾大学心理学系本土心理学研究室编辑出版,1995.
9佐斌.中国人的关系取向：概念及其测量.华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版），2002,41(1):74-80.
10 张阳阳.大学生关系取向及其对自我提升的影响研究.硕士论文.华中师范大学,2006.
11 Foa U G,Foa E B.Resource theory: interpersonal behavior as exchange.In:K.J.Gergen,M.S.Greenberg,R.H.Willis.Eds.Social Exchange:Advances in Theory and Research.New York: Plenum Press.1980.
12 翟学伟.中国人：脸面类型、关系构成与群体意识.见：沙莲香.主编.社会学家的沉思：中国社会文化心理.北京：中国社会出版社，1998.262-296.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目：国家社会科学基金项目（03BSH022）
更新日期/Last Update:  2009-01-16