我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 小学生非形式推理能力的发展(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2010年30卷03期
页码:
 22-28
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2010-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Development of Primary Student’s Informal Reasoning
作者:
 张奇1; 2; 张艳君2; 张黎2
 1.北京师范大学 发展心理研究所，北京 100875；2.辽宁师范大学 心理系，大连 116029
Author(s):
 Zhang Qi1; 2; Zhang Yanjun2; Zhang Li2
 1.Development Psychology Institute，Beijing Normal University，Beijing 100875； 2.Psychology Department of Liaoning Normal University，Dalian 116029
关键词:
 小学生; 非形式推理; 发展
Keywords:
 primary students; informal reasoning; development
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 文章在提出非形式推理评价指标体系的基础上，采用提示访谈法考察了小学生非形式推理能力的发展。结果显示：少数1、2年级小学生处于理由推理水平，多数能够进行反驳推理，3至6年级小学生都能做出反驳推理；三种理由的数量都存在显著的年级差异，功能性理由的数量随年级增长而增多；高年级学生的反驳次数都显著多于低年级学生；低年级学生的推理中断次数和推理错误总次数显著多于高年级，并随年级的增长呈下降趋势。
Abstract:
 According to the informal reasoning evaluation system putting forward by the authors，ill-structured problem tests were administered to 1-6 grade students by prompting clinical interview method.The results showed that：(1)Most of grade 1 and 2 students were at reason reasoning and refuting reasoning level；Most of the grade 3-6 students reached refuting reasoning level and were on the two level of refuting reasoning.(2)The students of higher grade generated significantly more functional reason，conditional reason and the total number of all reasons than the students of lower grade；(3)Significant differences were found on the number of direct refuting，indirect refuting and the total number of refuting generated by 1-6 grade students；(4)The students of higher grade make significantly more reasoning break and the total number of reasoning mistakes than the students of lower grade.The students made fewer mistakes with grade increasing.

参考文献/References

 1Zohar A，Nemet F.Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching，2002，39：35-62.
2Sadler T D，Zeidler D L.Patten of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific Decision-Making.Journal of Research in Science Teaching，2005，42：112-138.
3Baron J.My.side bias in thinking about abortion.Thinking and Reasoning，1995，1(3)：221-235.
4Means M L，Voss J F.Who reasons well ? two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade，ability，and knowledge levels.Cognition and Iinstruction，1996，14(2)：139-178.
5Golder C，Coirier P.Argumentative text writing：Developmental trends.Discourse Processes，1994，18：187–210.
6Pontecorvo C，Girardet H.Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics.Cognition and Instruction，1993，1：365-395.
7Kuhn D.How do people know?Psychological Sciences，2001，12(1)：1-8.
8Stein N L，Miller C A.I win-you lose：the development of argumentative thinking.In：Voss J F，Perkins D N，Segal J.Eds.Informal reasoning and instruction.Hillsdale NJ：Erlbaum，1991.
9Kortland K.An STS case study about students’ decision making on the waste issue.Science Education，1996，80：673-689.
10Tytler R，Duggan S.Dimensions of evidence，the public understanding of science and science education.International Journal of Science Education，2001，23：815-832.
11Sadler T D，Chambers F W.Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue.International Journal of Science Education，2004，26：387-409.
12Korpan C A，Bisanz G L.Assessing literacy in science：evaluation of scientific news briefs.Science Education，1997，81：515-532.
13Voss J F，Blais J，Means M L.Informal reasoning and subject matter knowledge in the solving of economics problems by nave and novice individuals.Cognition and Instruction，1986，3(4)：269-302.
14Perkins D N.Post-primary education has little impact upon informal reasoning.Journal of Educational Psychology，1985，77：562-571.
15Kuhn D.The skills of argument.England：Cambridge University Press，1991.
16Zohar A，Nemet F.Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching，2002，39：35-62.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金(06JJDXLX001)。
更新日期/Last Update:  2011-11-03