青少年风险决策的时程加工机制：来自ERP的证据
《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]
- 期数:
- 2011年31卷03期
- 页码:
- 223-229
- 栏目:
- 认知与学校心理学
- 出版日期:
- 2011-05-01
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Adolescents’ Risky Decision Making：An ERP Study
- 作者:
- 张娅玲;袁文萍;刘雷;冯廷勇
- 西南大学 心理学院，重庆 400715
- Author(s):
- Zhang Yaling;Yuan Wenping;Liu Lei;Feng Tingyong
- School of Psychology，Southwest University，Chongqing 400715
- Keywords:
- adolescent; risky decision making; ERP; N400; LPC
- 分类号:
- B842.5
- DOI:
- -
- 文献标识码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 采用事件相关电位(ERP)研究技术，运用剑桥风险任务的实验范式，考察了青少年风险决策的时程加工机制。行为结果表明，在高、中、低三种不确定性条件下，相对于效价，被试的决策更多的关注概率。脑电结果显示：1)不确定性的主效应在N400上表现显著，高不确定条件和中不确定条件的波幅要明显大于低不确定性条件的波幅，而高不确定条件和中不确定条件的波幅无显著差异；2)与中不确定条件相比，高不确定条件和低不确定条件诱发了一个新异正成分(LPC)，高不确定条件和低不确定条件的波幅要明显大于中不确定性条件的波幅，而高不确定条件和低不确定条件的波幅无显著差异。青少年在风险任务中的决策较多的是选择安全选项，表现出较为明显的风险规避倾向。N400的波幅可能反映了不确定性程度，而LPC的波幅大小可能反映了结果评价准确性程度的高低。
- Abstract:
- The present study adopted Event-Related Potentials(ERP)technique，using Cambridge Gambling Task to investigate the electrophysiological evidence of adolescents’ risky decision making.EEG results showed that：(1)The main effect of uncertainty on the component of N400 was significant，high and middle uncertainty conditions elicited larger N400 amplitudes than that of low uncertainty condition，while there was no significant difference between high and middle uncertainty conditions；(2)Compared with the middle uncertainty condition，high and low uncertainty conditions induced a novel late positive component(LPC)，the amplitude of high uncertainty and low uncertainty was significantly larger than the middle uncertainty condition amplitude，but the difference of amplitude of LPC between high uncertainty and low uncertainty conditions was not significant.Adolescents in risky decision making task chose more security options，showing obvious tendency to risk aversion.N400 may reflect the degree of uncertainty，and the amplitude of LPC may reflect the degree of accuracy of the outcome evaluation.
参考文献/References
1Simon H A.Decision making and problem solving，report of research briefing panel on decision making and problem solving.Washington DC：National Academy Press，1989. 2Kahneman D.Maps of bounded rationality：psychology for behavioral economics.The American Economic Review，2003，93(5)：1449-1475. 3Martin L E，Potts G F.Impulsivity in decision-making：An event-related potential investigation.Personality and Individual Differences，2009，46：303-308. 4Polezzi D，et al..Brain correlates of risky decision-making.Neuroimage，2010，49：1886-1894. 5Rogers R D，et al..Choosing between small，likely rewards and large，unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex.The Journal of Neuroscience，1999，20(19)：9029-9038. 6Ernst M，et al..Decision-making in a risk-taking task：A PET study.Neuropsychopharmacology，2002，26：682-691. 7Krain A L，et al..Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity：A meta-analysis of decision-making.Neuroimage，2006，32：477-484. 8Winters K C.Adolescent brain development and drug abuse.TRI Science Addiction，2004. 9Barraclough D J，Conroy M L，Lee D.Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game.Nature Neuroscience，2004，7(4)：404-410.
10Millstein S，Halpern-Felsher B.Perceptions of risk and vulnerability.Journal of Adolescent Health，2002，31：10-27.
11朱莉琪，方富熹，皇甫刚.儿童“期望值”判断的研究.心理学报，2002，34(5)：517-521.
12Steinberg L.A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking.Dev Rev，2008，28(1)：78-106.
13Proverbio A M，Riva F.RP and N400 ERP components refiect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions.Neuroscience Letters，2009，459：142-146.
14Neumann M F，Schweinberger S R.N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.Brain Research，2008，1239：181-190.
15Kutas M，Federmeier K D.Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.Trends in Cognitive Sciences，2000，4(12)：463-470.
16Ganis G，Kutas M.An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification.Cognitive Brain Research，2003，16(2)：123-144.
17Olivares E I，Iglesias J，Rodriguez-Holguin S.Long-latency ERPs and recognition of facial identity.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience，2003，15(1)：136-151.
18West W C，Holcomb P J.Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures.Cognitive Brain Research，2002，13(3)：363-375.
19Kutas M，Federmeier K D.Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.Trends in Cognitive Sciences，2000，4(12)：463-470.
20Hagoort P.Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension：ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience，2003，15(6)：883-899.
21Hagoort P，et al..Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension.Science，2004，304：438-441.
22Curran T.Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity.Neuropsychologia，2004，42：1088-1106.
23Rugg M D，et al..Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory.Nature，1998，392：595-598.
24Lau E F，Phillips C，Poeppel D.A cortical network for semantics：(de)constructing the N400.Nature Reviews Neuroscience，2008，9：920-933.
25Kiehl K A，Laurens K R，Liddle P F.Reading anomalous sentences：An event-related fMRI study of semantic processing.Neurimage，2002，17：842-850.
26Fleck M S，Daselaar S M.Role of prefrontal and anterior cingulate regions in decision-making processes shared by memory and nonmemory tasks.Cerebral Cortex，2006，16：1623-1630.
27冯廷勇.一种不确定情境中决策过程的认知与神经机制研究.博士学位论文.重庆：西南大学，2007.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 基金项目：国家自然科学基金青年项目(30800292)，教育部人文社会科学规划项目(07JAXLX009)，211三期工程国家重点学科建设项目(NSKD08007)。通讯作者：冯廷勇，E-mail：fengty0@swu.edu.cn。
常用功能
统计/Statistics
- 摘要浏览/Viewed 2092
- 评论/Comments
