我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 基于印象管理量表的反应模式筛查故意作假者(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年03期
页码:
 236-240
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2018-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Using the Responses in Impression Management Scale to Identify Fakers
作者:
 任 岩 潘逸沁 骆 方
 北京师范大学心理学部,应用实验心理北京市重点实验室,心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学),北京 100875
Author(s):
 Ren Yan Pan Yiqin Luo Fang
 Faculty of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Experimental Teaching Demonstrating Center of Psychology(Beijing Normal University),Beijing 100875
关键词:
 社会称许性反应;  自我欺骗;  印象管理;  BIDR量表
Keywords:
 social desirability;  self-deception;  impression management;  BIDR scale
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 社会称许性反应由两个成分组成:自我欺骗(无意识地夸大反应)和印象管理(有意识地歪曲作答)。采用实验研究范式和Mixed Rasch Model,探讨二者在BIDR印象管理量表上的得分及作答模式差异。结果发现,当发生印象管理时,量表分数高于仅发生自我欺骗时的分数,且被试倾向选择极端反应。进而采用logistic回归对量表分数划定分界线,将高于分数线的被试认定为故意作假者,低于分界线的被试认定为仅发生了自我欺骗,没有故意作假。
Abstract:
 Social desirability consists of two components,self-deception and impression management.Self-deception refers to exaggerating responses unintendedly and impression management means distorting responses intendedly.The result from Mixed Rasch Model showed:the degree of social desirability response,of the subjects in the fake condition are higher than ones in the honest condition; the subjects in the fake condition tend to choose the extreme options.The result of logistic regression analysis showed the probability of 0.7 is a suitable cutting-off point for identifying severe fakers.

参考文献/References

 Dunning,D.,Heath,C.,& Suls,J.M.(2004).Flawed self-assessment implications for health,education,and the workplace.Psychological Science in the Public Interest,5(3),69-106.
Edwards,A.L.,& Walker,J.N.(1961).A short form of the MMPI:The SD scale.Psychological Reports.
Farrow,T.F.,Burgess,J.,Wilkinson,I.D.,& Hunter,M.D.(2015).Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management.Neuropsychologia,67,159-174.
Fischer,G.H.,& Molenaar,I.W.(2012).Rasch models:Foundations,recent developments,and applications.Springer Science & Business Media.
Goffin,R.D.,& Christiansen,N.D.(2003).Correcting personality tests for faking:A review of popular personality tests and an initial survey of researchers.International Journal of Selection and Assessment,11(4),340-344.
Holden,R.R.,Book,A.S.,Edwards,M.J.,Wasylkiw,L.,& Starzyk,K.B.(2003).Experimental faking in self-reported psychopathology:unidimensional or multidimensional?Personality and Individual Differences,35,1107-1117.
Krumpal,I.(2013).Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys:A literature review.Quality & Quantity,47(4),2025-2047.
Li,A.,& Bagger,J.(2006).Using the BIDR to distinguish the effects of impression management and self-deception on the criterion validity of personality measures:A meta-analysis.International Journal of Selection and Assessment,14(2),131-141.
Mueller-Hanson,R.,Heggestad,E.D.,& Thornton III,G.C.(2003).Faking and selection:Considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(2),348.
Paulhus,D.L.(1984).Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46,598-609.
Paulhus,D.L.(1991)Measurement and control of response bias.In J.P.Robinson,P.R.Shaver,& L.S.Wrightsman(Eds.),Measures of personality and social psychology attitudes.New York:Academic Press.
Perinelli,E.,& Gremigni,P.(2016).Use of social desirability scales in clinical psychology:A systematic review.Journal of clinical psychology,72(6),534-551.
Tracey,T.J.(2016).A note on socially desirable responding.Journal of Counseling Psychology,63(2),224.
Zickar,M.J.,Gibby,R.E.,& Robie,C.(2004).Uncovering faking samples in applicant,incumbent,and experimental data sets:An application of mixed-model item response theory.Organizational Research Methods,7(2),168-190.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:北京教育科学规划重点项目(CADA17078)。
通讯作者:骆方,E-mail:luof@bnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-05-30