我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 无辜受害事件对公正世界信念的威胁:观察者的角色偏倚(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2018年05期
页码:
 451-456
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2018-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Threat on Belief in a Just World by Event about Innocent Victims: Bias Caused by Observers' Role
作者:
 张洁婷1; 2; 王晓钧1; 2; 潮 萌1
 1.深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳 518060; 2.深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室,深圳 518060
Author(s):
 Zhang Jieting1; 2; Wang Xiaojun1; 2; Chao Meng1
 1.College of Psychology and Sociology,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060; 2.Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060
关键词:
 公正世界信念;  无辜受害者;  所属群体;  不公正体验
Keywords:
 Belief in a just world;  innocent victims;  affiliated group;  unjust experience
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 无辜受害者信息往往打破民众“好人有好报”的公正世界,而这种公正世界信念的威胁也因人而异。通过情绪Stroop效应验证这一心理现象,并探讨观察者与无辜受害者的群体归属以及观察者的不公正体验是否会影响公正世界信念威胁的程度。结果表明:(1)无论观察者是否与无辜受害者属于同一群体,或者观察者有无不公正体验,无辜受害者信息均会激活观察者的公正世界信念。(2)相比于外群体,当观察者与受害者属于同一群体类型(内群体)时,其公正世界信念的激活程度更强。(3)内群体观察者在有和无不公正体验的条件下,公正世界信念的威胁程度不存在显著差异。
Abstract:
 Purposes:People's belief in a just world(BJW),such that “good man should be rewarded”,are often threatened by events on innocent victim.This kind of threat on BJW may also have individual difference,which was related to group affiliation of the innocent victims,and accumulated amount of unjust affairs experience.Using an improved emotion Stroop paradigm,the current study aimed to validate this psychological threat of innocent victim information on BJW,and further investigate the moderation effect on this threat by the affiliation of the innocents relative to observers,as well as observers' unjust experience.The results demonstrated that:(1)Information of innocent victims did threaten the observers' BJW,no matter the innocence belonged to the same group with the observers or not,or the observers had unjust experiences or not.(2)Comparing with the out-group innocent victims,the in-group victims induced more threat on observers' BJW.(3)Whether observers have unjust experiences or not did not moderate the influence on the in-group observers' BJW.

参考文献/References

 白福宝.(2013).不公正感体验与公正感特质对风险水平的影响(博士学位论文).南京师范大学.
陈世平,崔鑫.(2015).从社会认同理论视角看内外群体偏爱的发展.心理与行为研究,13(3),422-427.
杜建政,祝振兵,李兴琨.(2007).大学生公正世界信念量表的初步编制.中国临床心理学杂志,15(3),239-241.
高婷婷.(2012).公正世界信念和认知风格对责备无辜受害者的影响(博士学位论文).辽宁师范大学.
景卫丽.(2014).受害者无辜、群体类型对公正世界信念构成威胁的影响(硕士学位论文).河南大学.
刘晓秋,李芷凌.(2014).大学生公正世界信念与应对方式的相关研究.中国健康心理学杂志,22(4),620-622.
辛自强,辛自飞.(2014).被信任者社会身份复杂性对其可信性的影响.心理学报,46(3),415-426.
王成康.(2012).公正世界信念中的自他重叠(硕士学位论文).南京大学.
吴胜涛,王力,周明洁,王文忠,张建新.(2009).灾区民众的公正观与幸福感及其与非灾区的比较.心理科学进展,17(3),579-587.
徐希宁.(2014).经济状况对公正世界信念激活状态的影响(硕士学位论文,pp.579-587).南京师范大学.
张莉,申继亮,黄瑞铭,罗曼楠.(2011).不同留守时间下儿童公正感的特点及其与主观幸福感的关系.心理发展与教育,5,484-490.
张雯,王荣,邱辉,徐凤,蒋奖.(2011).公正世界信念对幸福感的影响:目标追求的中介作用.中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨全国心理学学术会议.
钟毅平,邓棉琳,肖丽辉.(2012).公正世界信念对记忆偏差的影响.心理科学,35(6),1323-1327.
周春燕.(2013).公正世界信念对不同社会阶层的个体与社会功能研究(博士学位论文).华中师范大学.
Anderson,J.E.,Kay,A.C.,& Fitzsimons,G.M.(2010).In search of the silver lining:The justice motive fosters perceptions of benefits in the later lives of tragedy victims.Psychological Science,21,1599-1604.
Anderson,V.N.(1992).For whom is this world just?Sexual orientation and AIDS.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,22,248-259.
Bloom,J.R.,Kang,S.H.,& Romano,P.(1991).Cancer and stress:The effect of social support as a resource.Cancer and stress:Psychological,Biological and Coping Studies,95-121.
Braman,A.C.,& Lambert,A.J.(2001).Punishing individuals for their infirmities:Effects of personal responsibility,just-world beliefs,and in-group/out-group status.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,31,1096-1109.
Callan,M.J.,Ferguson,H.J.,& Bindemann,M.(2013).Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,142(1),34-40.
Callan,M.J.,Kay,A.C.,Davidenko,N.,& Ellard,J.H.(2009).The effects of justice motivation on memory for self-and other-relevant events.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,45,614-623.
Cubela,A.V.,& Kvartuc,T.(2007).Effects of mobbing on justice beliefs and adjustment.European Psychologist,72(4),261-271.
Dzuka,J.,& Dalbert,C.(2007).Student violence against teachers:Teachers' well-being and the belief in a just world.European Psychologist,2(4),253-261.
Fasel,R.,& Spini,D.(2010).Effects of Victimization on the Belief in a Just World in Four Ex-Yugoslavian Countries.Social Justice Research,23,17-36.
Gaucher,D.,Hafer,C.L.,Kay,A.C.,& Davidenko,N.(2010).Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday undeserved outcomes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,36,109-118.
Hafer,C.L.,& Begue,L.(2005).Experimental research on just-world theory:Problems,developments,and future challenges.Psychological Bulletin,131(1),128-167.
Jing,W.(2014).The influence of the victim's innocence and the group category on the threat to the belief in a just world.Advances in Psychology,04(03),490-495.
Lerner,M.J.,& Goldberg,J.H.(1999).When do decent people blame victims?The differing effects of the explicit/rational and implicit/experiential cognitive systems.In S.Chaiken & Y.Trope(Eds.),Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology(pp.627-640).New York:Guilford.
Lerner,M.J.,& Miller,D.T.(1978).Just world research and the attribution process:Looking back and ahead.Psychological Bulletin,85(5),1030-1042.
Malahy,L.W.,Rubinlicht,M.A.,& Kaiser,C.R.(2009).Justifying inequality:A cross-temporal investigation of US income disparities and just-world beliefs from 1973 to 2006.Social Justice Research,22(4),369-383.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家社会科学基金资助项目(13BSH053),国家自然科学基金资助项目(31700982),省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划2017年度项目(GD17YXL01),深圳市教育科学“十三五”规划招标课题(zdzz16004)。
通讯作者:王晓钧,E-mail:sfxy_wxj@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2018-09-30