我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 对象概念的具身认知能力模型构建(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2019年03期
页码:
 200-205
栏目:
 理论心理学
出版日期:
 2019-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Modeling an Embodied Cognitive Capacity for Object Concepts
文章编号:
1003-5184(2019)03-0200-06
作者:
 王金龙1曾 绪1鲜大权2
 (1.西南科技大学外国语学院,绵阳 621010; 2.西南科技大学理学院,绵阳 621010)
Author(s):
 Wang Jinlong1Zeng Xu1Xian Daquan2
 (1.School of Foreign Languages and Cultures,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010; 2.School of Sciences,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010)
关键词:
 具身认知 概念熟悉度 概念掌握度 具身性 具身认知能力
Keywords:
 embodied cognition conceptual familiarity conceptual mastery embodiment embodied cognitive capacity
分类号:
 B8409
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 研究旨在从具身认知视角重新建构概念熟悉度、概念掌握度及名词具身性的定义和评价指标,探索了具体名词的具身性与概念掌握度的关系。借助Amsel等(2012)的调查结果和MRC心理语言学数据,采用逻辑演绎与回归分析结合的建模法构建了376个具体名词的具身性与概念掌握度的关系模型,提出了具身认知能力假设。结果表明,对象概念的在线加工过程呈现出一个较长的“停滞期”,反映了认知主体的具身认知潜势。
Abstract:
 In view of embodied cognition,this study aims to redefine and index variables of conceptual familiarity,conceptual mastery,and nominal embodiment and further explore the relationship of embodiment and conceptual mastery for concrete nouns.With the normative data from Amsel et al.'s(2012)experiment and MRC database,a relationship model of was built for 376 concrete nouns as to their embodiment and conceptual mastery via the model building method of combining logical deduction with regression analysis.Thus an embodied cognitive capacity was hypothesized.Results showed that there exists a comparatively long stagnant period during the online conceptual processing of object concepts,reflecting a kind of subjects' embodied cognitive potential.

参考文献/References

 Louwerse,M.,何先友作.(2017).语言加工中的符号相互依存:语言统计和知觉模拟的交互作用(邓玉梅,赵雪汝,薛颖 译).华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2,51-60. 王寅.(2009).国外神经科学最新发现对语言体验性的论证———十六论语言的体验性:模拟论语义学.外语教学,3,1-6. 王寅.(2013).体验哲学和认知语言学为语言哲学之延续———二十九论语言的体认性.中国外语,10(1),18-26. 叶浩生.(2010).具身认知:认知心理学的新取向.心理科学进展,18(5),705-710. 叶浩生.(2012).镜像神经元:认知具身性的神经生物学证据.心理学探新,32(1),3-7. 叶浩生.(2013).认知与身体:理论心理学的视角.心理学报,45(4),481-488. Amsel,B.(2011).Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial eventrelatedpotentials.Neuropsychologia,49(5),970-983. Amsel,B.,Thomas,P.,& Kutas,M.(2012).Perceptual and motor attribute ratings for 559 object Concepts.Behavior Research Methods,44(4),1028-1041. Barsalou,L.W.(2008a).Grounded cognition.Annual Review of Psychology,59,617-645. Barsalou,L.W.(2008b).Situating concepts.In P.Robbins & M.Aydede(Eds.),Cambridge handbook of situated cognition(pp.236-263).New York:Cambridge University Press. Benjafield,J.,& Muckenheim,R.(1989).Dates of entry and measures of imagery,concreteness,goodness,and familiarity for 1,046 words sampled from the Oxford English Dictionary.Behavior Research Methods,Instruments & Computers,21,31-52. Campos,A.(2002).Interest value,meaningfulness,and familiarity of words:Relations with other word properties.Perceptual and Motor Skills,95,769-774. Clark,A.(2011).Supersizing the mind:Embodiment,action,and cognitive extension.New York:Oxford University Press. Cree,G.S.,& McRae,K.(2003).Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk,cherry,chisel,cheese,and cello(and many other such concrete nouns).Journal of Experimental Psychology General,132,163-201. Crossley,S.A.,Salsbury,T.,Mcnamara,D.S.,& Jarvis,S.(2011).What is lexical proficiency?Some answers from computational models of speech data.TESOL Quarterly,45,182-193. Dudschig,C.,Vega,I.D.,& Kaup,B.(2014).Embodiment and second-language:Automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words andemotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm.Brain & Language,132,14-21. Gallese,V.,& Lakoff,G.(2005).The brain's concepts:The role of the sensorymotor system in conceptual knowledge.Cognitive Neuropsychology,22,455-479. Gibbs,R.W.(2006).Embodiment and cognitive science.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Glenberg,A.M.(2008).Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology.Advanced Review,1,586-596. Hargreaves,I.S.,Leonard,G.A.,Pexman,P.M.,Pittman,D.J.,Siakalu,P.D.,& Goodyear,B.G.(2012).The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6(4),1092-1097. Howell,S.,Jankowicz,D.,& Becker,S.(2005).A model of grounded language acquisition:Sensorimotor features improve lexicaland grammatical learning.Journal of Memory and Language,53,258-276. Juhasz,B.J.,& Yap,M.J.(2013).Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono-and disyllabic words.Behavior Research Methods,45(1),160-168. Martin,A.(2007).The representation of object concepts in the brain.Annual Review of Psychology,58,25-45. McMurray,B.,Horst,J.,& Samuelson,L.(2012).Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning.Psychological Review,119(4),831-877. Öttl,B.,Dudschig,C.,& Kaup,B.(2016).Forming associations between language and sensorimotor traces during novel word learning.Language and Cognition,1,1-16. Paivio,A.(1968).A factor-analytic study of word attributes and verbal learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,7,41-49. Pexman,P.M.,Hargreaves,I.S.,Siakaluk,P.D.,Bodner,G.E.,& Pope,J.(2008).There are many ways to be rich:Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,15(1),161-167. Regier,T.(1996).The human semantic potential:Spatial language and constrained connectionism.Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press. Richter,T.,Zwaan,R.A.,& Hoever,I.(2009).Acquiring experiential traces in word-referent learning.Memory & Cognition,37,1187-1196. Tousignant,C.,& Pexman,P.M.(2012).Flexible recruitment of semantic richness:Context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6,53. Wu,L.L.,& Barsalou,L.W.(2009).Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination:Evidence from property generation.Acta Psychologica,132(2),173-189. Yap,M.J.,Pexman,P.M.,Wellsby,M.,Hargreaves,I.S.,& Huff,M.J.(2012).Anabundance of riches:Cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effectsinvisual word recognition.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6(72),72. Zwaan,R.A.(2004).The immersed experiencer:Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension.In B.H.Ross(Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation(pp.35-62).York:Academic Press.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:四川省哲学社会科学研究项目(sc11wy004),四川外国语言文学研究中心重点项目(SCWY17-12)。 通讯作者:王金龙,E-mail:Wangjinlong@swust.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2019-06-30