«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:

 2021年01期

页码:

 20-27

栏目:

 

出版日期:

 2021-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

 The Latent Category of Reading Strategy and Its Relationship with Reading Performance——Based on the Latent Profile Analysis

文章编号:

1003-5184(2021)01-0020-08

作者:

 黄熙彤 张敏强 何本中 陈兆兴

 (1.华南师范大学心理学院,广州 510631; 2.教育部脑认知与教育科学重点实验室(华南师范大学),广州 510631; 3.华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631; 4.华南师范大学广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室,广州 510631; 5.广州市天河区教育局教研室,广州 510000; 6.广州市海珠区教育发展中心,广州 510250)

Author(s):

 Huang Xitong Zhang Minqiang He Benzhong Chen Zhaoxing

 (1.School of Psychology,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631; 2.Key Laboratory of Brain,Cognition and Education Sciences(South China Normal University),Guangzhou 510631; 3.Center for Studies of Psychological Application,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631; 4.Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631; 5.Tianhe District Teaching and Research Office,Guangzhou 510000; 6.Haizhu District Education Development Center,Guangzhou 510250)

关键词:

 小学生;  阅读策略使用;  阅读成绩;  潜在剖面分析

Keywords:

 sixth grade;  reading strategy;  reading performance;  latent profile analysis

分类号:

 B842.5

DOI:

 -

文献标识码:

 A

摘要:

 本研究以18299名六年级学生为研究对象,通过潜在剖面分析和方差分析,探讨了六年级学生阅读多策略使用类型的潜在异质性及其对阅读成绩的影响,结果显示:(1)六年级学生的阅读多策略使用存在3个类别:熟练使用型(占36.35%),基本掌握型(占49.29%),有待提升型(占14.36%);(2)3类学生在2类文本(文学类和信息类)和4种阅读能力(分析与整合、获取与解释、连接与推论、感悟与评价)上的阅读成绩均为:属于熟练使用型的六年级学生最好,属于基本掌握型的六年级学生次之,属于有待提升型的六年级学生最差。研究结果表明对学生开展阅读多策略使用的指导非常重要。

Abstract:

 Based on the data of Sunshine Evaluation of Primary and Secondary Education Quality Project of Guangzhou City in 2016,this study analyzed the potential heterogeneity in the patterns of reading strategy use and explored the relationship between patterns of reading strategy use and reading performance of sixth grade students.The results revealed that there exist three different patterns of reading strategy use in sixth grade students:Skilled,Adequate,and Inadequate.And reading performance varied in students with different use patterns.The skilled group showed higher reading literacy than other two groups in both types of texts(narrative texts and informational texts)and both types of reading ability(analysis and integration,acquisition and interpretation,connection and inference,perception and evaluation).These results underscored the importance of the guidance of how to use various reading strategies with different types of reading text.

参考文献/References

 白学军,沈德立.(1995).初学阅读者与熟练阅读者阅读课文时眼动特征的比较研究.心理发展与教育,11(2),1-7.
曹宝龙,刘慧娟,林崇德.(2005).认知负荷对小学生工作记忆资源分配策略的影响.心理发展与教育,21(1),36-42.
郝嘉佳,陈英和.(2010).小学儿童在线和离线元认知监控的发展特点及其对问题解决的影响.心理科学,33(5),1108-1112.
刘晶晶,郭元祥.(2015).小学语文阅读素养:内涵、构成及测量.课程.教材.教法,(5),69-75.
刘电芝,孙泽军.(2004).说明文形式图式阅读策略训练提高初中生阅读水平的实验研究.心理科学,27(6),1410-1413.
刘甜甜.(2015).实用文阅读教学新探(硕士学位论文).西南大学.
陆娟娟.(2013).九年级学生阅读素养评价的研究(硕士学位论文).南京师范大学.
兰丹,魏小娜.(2017).PISA 2018阅读策略体系构建及教学启示.语文建设,(31),30-33.
倪雨菡,张敏强,霍紫莹,王婧,黄菲菲.(2016).俱乐部与球迷攻击性的关系:基于潜在剖面分析.心理学探新,36(6),563-567.
邱麒忠.(2014).学习兴趣、学习策略和学习偏好对国小学生国语文学习成就之结构方程模型分析:以TASA 2009为例.市北教育学刊,(45),99-138.
齐宇歆.(2013).基于PISA的学习素养评价系统设计(硕士学位论文).华东师范大学.
苏斌原,张洁婷,喻承甫,张卫.(2015).大学生心理行为问题的识别:基于潜在剖面分析.心理发展与教育,31(3),350-359.
宋乃庆,肖林,程浩.(2017).小学生阅读素养的背景因素探析—基于国际阅读素养进步研究视角.课程与教学,(2),61-66.
王春富,王志远.(2010).语文阅读策略探微.吉林教育,(1),30-31.
谢延秀.(2006).实用文体与文学文体之分野及融合.理论导刊,(4),75-77.
许凌霄.(2016).词切分方式对于初级阅读者和熟练阅读者的影响.教育教学论坛,(2),186-187.
张洁婷,焦璨,张敏强.(2010).潜在类别分析技术在心理学研究中的应用.心理科学进展,(12),1991-1998.
张文静,辛涛.(2012).阅读投入对阅读素养影响的跨文化比较研究——以PISA2009为例.心理发展与教育,28(2),175-183.
职雪雯.(2012).从PIRLS项目看阅读素养的测评与培养(硕士学位论文).上海师范大学.
祝新华.(2012).侧重评核选取与运用信息的能力——阅读测试文本的选用.课程.教材.教法,(10),60-66.
Anderson,N.J.(1991).Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing.Modern Language Journal,75(4),460-472.
Ahmadi,M.R.,Ismail,H.N.,& Abdullah,U.A.(2013).The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension.English Language Teaching,6(10),235-244.
Cohen,A.D.,& Macaro,E.(2007).Language learner strategies:Thirty years of research and practice.Oxford University Press.
Denton,C.A.,Enos,M.,York,M.J.,Francis,D.J.,Barnes,M.A.,Kulesz,P.A.,et al.(2015).Text-processing differences in adolescent adequate and poor comprehenders reading accessible and challenging narrative and informational text.Reading Research Quarterly,50(4),393-416.
He,H.,Hu,C.,& Liu,H.(2014).On the significance of learner strategies in English reading on learners’ language achievement.Journal of Language Teaching & Research,5(2),323-328.
Kulac,D.,& Walters,J.D.(2016).The effect of contextual inferencing strategies on EFL learners attitudes towards reading.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,232,486-493.
Lau,K.L.,& Chan,D.W.(2003).Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong.Journal of Research in Reading,26(2),177-190.
Mokhtari,K.,& Reichard,C.A.(2002).Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology,94(2),249-259.
Miyake,A.,Just,M.A.,& Carpenter,P.A.(1994).Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity:Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts.Journal of Memory and Language,33(2),175-202.
Mullis,I.V.S.E.,& Martin,M.O.E.(2015).PIRLS 2016 assessment framework(2nd edition,pp.4-6).TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Muthén,L.K.,& Muthén,B.O.(2007).Mplus:Statistical analysis with latent variables.Computer Software Transparent Optical Networks,1,313-316.
OECD.(2009).PISA 2009 assessment framework-key competencies in reading,mathematics and science.OECD Publication.
OECD.(2010).PISA 2009 results:Learning to learn-student engagement,strategies and practices(Volume III).OECD Publication.
OECD.(2013).PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework:Mathematics,reading,science,problem solving and financial literacy.OECD Publication.
OECD.(2017).PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework:Science,reading,mathematic,financial,literacy and collaborative problem solving.OECD Publication.
Palincsar,A.S.,& Brown,A.L.(1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition & Instruction,1(2),117-175.
Paul,V.D.B.,Rapp,D.N.,& Kendeou,P.(2005).Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension.Discourse Processes,39(2),299-316.
Petras,H.,& Masyn,K.(2010).General growth mixture analysis with antecedents and consequences of change.Handbook of Quantitative Criminology.Springer New York.
Rigney,J.W.(1978).Learning strategies:A theoretical perspective1.Learning Strategies,7,165-205.
Simsek,A.,& Balaban,J.(2010).Learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful university students.Online Submission,1,36-45.
Swanson,H.L.,& Alexander,J.E.(1997).Cognitive processes as predictors of word re-cognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers:Revisiting the specificity hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology,89(1),128-158.
Wu,J.Y.,& Peng,Y.C.(2017).The modality effect on reading literacy:Perspectives from students’ online reading habits,cognitive and metacognitive strategies,and web navigation skills across regions.Interactive Learning Environments,25,1-18.
Yussof,Y.M.(2013).Students’ reading comprehension performance with emotional literacy-based strategy intervention.International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies,1(1),82-88.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

 通讯作者:张敏强,E-mail:2640726401@qq.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update:  2021-02-20