我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 汉语阅读中词切分研究进展(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2021年05期
页码:
 404-410
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2021-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Advances in Word Segmentation During Chinese Reading
文章编号:
1003-5184(2021)05-0404-07
作者:
 胡 睿 肖少北
 (海南师范大学心理学院,海口 571158)
Author(s):
 Hu Rui Xiao Shaobei
 (School of Psychology,Hainan Normal University,Haikou 571158)
关键词:
 汉语阅读;  词切分;  词汇加工;  眼动
Keywords:
 Chinese reading;  word segmentation;  lexical processing;  eye movement
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 词切分指读者在文本阅读过程中将词从句子或语篇中切分出来以促进文本阅读与加工的过程。本文对近20 年来汉语词切分研究成果总结发现:词间空格、词素特性、词意识、词汇预期均可作为词切分的依据; 汉语阅读存在词n和词n+1两种切分,两种切分过程中字词加工均遵循交互激活假设,切分词n过程中字词加工的交互激活特点表现为字词同等相互影响,切分词n+1过程中字词加工的交互激活特点更多表现为词汇加工影响字加工; 重叠歧义词切分遵循多重激活假设,其中被激活的单词之间的竞争机制符合竞争假设,左侧词汇在这一竞争中具有优势,此外,重叠歧义词的切分受到词频,语境的影响。
Abstract:
 Word segmentation refers to the process by which readers segment words from sentences or texts during text reading to facilitate text reading and processing.This paper summarizes the findings of the research on Chinese word segmentation in the past 20 years,and finds that:spaces between words,morpheme characteristics,word consciousness,and vocabulary expectations can all be used as the basis for word segmentation; There are two word segmentation phenomena in Chinese reading,one occurs at word n,and the other occurs at word n + 1.The interactive activation feature of word processing in the process of segmenting word n is manifested in that character processing and word processing are equally affected by each other,and the interactive activation feature of word processing in the process of segmenting word n + 1 is more manifested as word processing affecting character processing; overlapping ambiguous word segmentation exists on the left Segmentation preference,moreover lapping ambiguous word segmentation is affected by word frequency and context.

参考文献/References

 白学军,曹玉肖,顾俊娟,郭志英,等.(2011).可预测性和空格对中文阅读影响的眼动研究.心理科学,34(6),1282-1288.
白学军,李馨,闫国利.(2015).汉语阅读眼动控制:20年研究的总结.心理发展与教育,31(1),85-91.
白学军,张涛,田丽娟,梁菲菲,等.(2010).词切分对美国留学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究.心理研究,3(5),25-30.
陈朝阳,刘志方,苏永强,程亚华.(2018).高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据.心理发展与教育,34(6),692-699.
陈曦,张积家.(2005).汉语多词素词识别及表征的理论和新设想.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),(3),120-126+160.
崔磊,关宜韫,张颖靓,闫国利.(2019).单字词和复合词预视加工的差异性研究:词边界信息无影响.心理科学,42(6),1298-1304.
付彧,何立媛,吴蕊涵,闫国利.(2015).不同年级学生词边界划分的发展研究.心理与行为研究,13(1),59-64.
顾俊娟,张郢,郑海英.(2017).词切分对俄国留学生汉语阅读影响的眼动研究.心理研究,10(4),22-29.
李卫君,刘梦,张政华,邓娜丽,等.(2018).口吃者加工汉语歧义短语的神经过程.心理学报,50(12),1323-1335.
李兴珊,刘萍萍,马国杰.(2011).中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评.心理科学进展,19(4),459-470.
梁菲菲,王永胜,白学军.(2016).词间空格促进汉语阅读的新词学习:词素位置的调节作用.心理学探新,36(5),403-408.
梁菲菲,王永胜,张慢慢,闫国利,等.(2016).新词词素熟悉性影响视觉词切分线索在新词学习中的促进作用.心理科学,39(2),258-264.
刘志方,仝文,张智君,赵亚军.(2020).语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响:眼动证据.心理学报,52(9),1031-1047.
刘志方,闫国利,张智君,潘运,等.(2013).中文阅读中的预视效应与词切分.心理学报,45(6),614-625.
刘志方,张智君,杨桂芳.(2016).中文阅读中的字词激活模式:来自提示词边界延时效应的证据.心理学报,48(9),1082-1092.
沈德立,白学军,臧传丽,闫国利,等.(2010).词切分对初学者句子阅读影响的眼动研究.心理学报,42(2),159-172.
苏衡,刘志方,曹立人.(2016).中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示:基于眼动的证据.心理学报,48(6),625-636.
王穗苹,佟秀红,杨锦绵,冷英.(2009).中文句子阅读中语义信息对眼动预视效应的影响.心理学报,41(3),220-232.
向慧雯,胡欣灼,杨闰荣,隋雪.(2018).中文词切分的依据及眼动控制模型的解释.心理科学,41(5),1097-1102.
徐芬.(2002).儿童早期字词意识的发展.心理发展与教育,18(4),31-35.
闫国利,张兰兰,张霞,孙莎莎.(2012).汉语阅读中的心理词加工.心理与行为研究,10(3),183-189.
于泽,韩玉昌.(2011).书面韵律边界与语境对歧义句歧义消解的影响.心理科学,34(6),1320-1324.
张兰兰,闫国利,白学军.(2013).不同年级学生词意识发展的研究.南开语言学刊,(1),112-120.
张文嘉,李楠,关少伟,王穗苹.(2014).中文阅读中副中央凹语义信息的提取:来自ERPs的证据.心理学报,46(9),1261-1270.
张智君,刘志方,赵亚军,季靖.(2012).汉语阅读过程中词切分的位置:一项基于眼动随动显示技术的研究.心理学报,44(1),51-62.
赵思敏,吴岩,李天虹,郭庆童.(2017).词汇识别中歧义词素语义加工:ERP研究.心理学报,49(3),296-306.
Blythe,H.I.,Liang,F.,Zang,C.,Wang,J.,Yan,G.,Bai,X.,et al.(2012).Inserting spaces into Chinese text helps readers to learn new words:An eye movement study.Journal of Memory and Language,67(2),241-254.
Gu,J.,& Li,X.(2015).The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading.Attention,Perception,& Psychophysics,77(1),272-281.
Huang,L.,& Li,X.(2020).Early,but not overwhelming:The effect of prior context on segmenting overlapping ambiguous strings when reading Chinese.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,73(9),1382-1395.
Inhoff,A.W.,& Wu,C.(2005).Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during chinese sentence reading.Memory & Cognition,33(8),1345-1356.
Kliegl,R.,Grabner,E.,Rolfs,M.,& Engbert,R.(2004).Length,frequency,andpredictability effects of words on eye movements in reading.The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,16(1-2),262-284.
Li,X.,& Pollatsek,A.(2020).An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading.Psychological Review,127(6),1139.
Li,X.,Rayner,K.,& Cave,K.R.(2009).On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading.Cognitive Psychology,58(4),525-552.
Liu,P.,& Li,X.(2014).Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese:Evidence from eye movements.British Journal of Psychology,105(1),57-68.
Ma,G.,Li,X.,& Rayner,K.(2014).Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,40(3),1046.
Rayner,K.,Binder,K.S.,Ashby,J.,& Pollatsek,A.(2001).Eye movement control in reading:Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words.Vision Research,41(7),943-954.
Rayner,K.,& Schotter,E.R.(2014).Semantic preview benefit in reading English:The effect of initial letter capitalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,40(4),1617.
Rayner,K.,Xingshan,Li.,Juhasz,B.J.,& Yan,G.(2005).The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12(6),1089-1093.
Shen,D.P.L.S.,Tian,J.,Zang,C.,Cui,L.,Bai,X.,et al.(2012).Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,18(2),192.
Yan,G.,Tian,H.,Bai,X.,& Rayner,K.(2006).The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers.British Journal of Psychology,97(2),259-268.
Yan,M.,Reinhold,K.,Shu,H.,Pan,J.,& Zhou,X.(2010).Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,36(6),1669.
Yan,M.,Zhou,W.,Shu,H.,& Kliegl,R.(2015).Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,41(1),209-219.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:海南省自然科学基金面上项目(318MS048),海南省哲学社会科学规划课题(HNSK(JD)17-24)。
通讯作者:肖少北,E-mail:xiaoshb@ hainnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  1900-01-01