我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 惯用语键和成分字词在动宾结构惯用语理解中的作用(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2024年03期
页码:
 209-217
栏目:
 认知心理学
出版日期:
 2024-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Roles of Idiomatic Keys and Component Words in the Understanding of Verb-Object Idiomatic Structure
文章编号:
1003-5184(2024)03-0209-09
作者:
 张积家1; 孙尔鸿2
 (1.广西师范大学教育学部心理学系,桂林 541001; 2.海军军医大学护理系,上海 200433)
Author(s):
 Zhang Jijia1; Sun Erhong2
 (1.Department of Psychology,Education Department,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541001; 2.Department of Nursing Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433)
关键词:
 动宾结构惯用语;  惯用语键;  成分字词;  预测性
Keywords:
 verb-object idioms;  predictability;  idiomatic key;  compositions of idiom
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 采用启动词汇判断范式,考察惯用语键和成分字词在动宾结构惯用语理解中的作用。实验1考察在高、低可预测性惯用语中是否存在惯用语键,发现存在惯用语键并影响理解。实验2考察成分字词是否在惯用语比喻义激活中起作用,发现在即时加工和延时加工时,尾字语义违反阻碍比喻义激活,延时加工时,首字语义违反阻碍比喻义激活。整个研究表明,汉语动宾结构惯用语理解符合混合表征观,既存在成分字词的激活,也受惯用语结构影响。
Abstract:
 Using the priming vocabulary judgment paradigm,this paper examines the role of idiomatic key and component words in the comprehension of verb-object structures.Experiment 1 examines whether there are idiomatic keys in high and low predictability idiomatic phrases,and finds that the existence of idiomatic keys affects comprehension.Experiment 2 examines whether constituent words play a role in the metaphorical activation of idiomatic expressions.It is found that the semantic violation of the last word hinds the metaphorical activation in both immediate processing and delayed processing,and the semantic violation of the first word hinds the metaphorical activation in delayed processing.The whole study shows that the understanding of Chinese verb-object structure idiomatic expressions conforms to the mixed representation view,which is influenced by both the activation of component words and the structure of idiomatic expressions.

参考文献/References

 陈丽霞.(2010).汉语 VO 三字格熟语结构语义特14点及修辞功能分析.毕节学院学报,28(9),8-12.
池挺钦.(2004).浅析三字格惯用语的稳定性.广西社会科学,(8),177-179.
符颖,鹿子佳,张慢慢,臧传丽,白学军.(2022).中文惯用语的加工:结构和熟悉性的作用.心理科学,45(6),1290.
顾蓓晔,缪小春.(1995).汉语习语理解研究.心理学报,27(1),15-19.
马利军,张积家.(2011).汉语三字格惯用语的语义性质及其关系.语言文字应用,(2),64-72.
马利军,张静宇,张积家.(2007).对惯用语理解机制的一些新设想.广州大学学报(社会科学版),6(7),16-20.
佘贤君,宋歌,张必隐.(2000).预测性、语义倾向性对惯用语理解的影响.心理学报,32(2),203-209.
佘贤君,王莉,刘伟,张必隐.(1998).惯用语的理解:构造还是提取.心理科学,21(4),346-349.
佘贤君,吴建民.(2000).惯用语比喻义理解的影响因素.宁波大学学报(教育科学版),22(1),10-13.
佘贤君,吴建民,张必隐.(2001).惯用语比喻义理解的心理模型.心理科学,24(3),362-368.
苏向丽.(2008).现代汉语惯用语的词汇化等级分析型.语言教学与研究,(5),62-69.
张积家,石艳彩.(2009).汉语惯用语的产生机制.心理学报,41(8),659-675.
张积家,马利军.(2008).词素性质对惯用语理解的影响.心理与行为研究,6(3),171-175.
张静宇,马利军,卢植.(2021).汉语惯用语理解机制研究:来自英文词素的启动效应证据.外国语,(5),53-61.
周宏溟.(1990).汉语惯用语词典.北京:商务印书馆.
朱风云,张辉.(2007).熟语语义的加工模式与其影响因素.外语研究,(4),8-15.
张辉,季锋.(2008).对熟语语义结构解释模式的探讨.外语与外语教学,(9),1-7.
Callies,S.,& Butcher,K.(2007).Processing of idiomatic expressions:Evidence for a new hybrid view.Metaphor & Symbol,22(1),79-108.
Cacciari,C.,& Tabossi,P.(1988).The comprehension of idioms.Journal of Memory and Language,27(6),668-683.
Cacciari,C.,Reati,F.,Colombo,M.,et al.(2006).The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in aphasic patients.Neuropsychology,44(8),1305-1314.
Chanturia,A.S.,Conklin,K.,& Schmitt,N.(2011).Adding more fuel to the fire:An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers.Second Language Research,(1),1-22.
Cutting,J.C.,& Bock,K.(1997).That's the way the cookie bounces:Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends.Memory and Cognition,25(25),57-71.
Cronk,B.C.,Lima,S.D.,& Schweigert,W.A.(1993).Idioms in sentences:Effects of frequency,literalness,and familiarity.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,22(1),59-82.
Gibbs,R.W.(1984).Literal meaning and psychological theory.Cognition Science,8(3),275-304.
Glucksberg,S.,Brown,M.,& McGlone,M.S.(1993).Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension.Memory and Cognition,21(5),711-719.
Kacinik,N.A.,& Chiarello,C.(2007).Understanding metaphors:Is the right hemisphere uniquely involved?Brain and Language,100(2),188-207.
Langlotz,A.(2006).Idiomatic creativity:A cognitive linguistic model of idiom representation and idiom variation in English.Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
Libben,M.R.,& Titone,D.A.(2008).The multi-determinded nature of idiom processing.Memory and Cognition,36(6),1103-1121.
Smolka,E.,Rabanus,S.,& Rosler,F.(2003).Processing verbs in german idioms:Evidence against the configuration hypothesis.Metaphor and Symbol,(22),213-231.
Sprenger,A.,Levelt,J.M.,& Kempen,G.(2006).Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases.Journal of Memory and Language,54(2),161-184.
Tabossi,P.,Fanari,R.,& Wolf,K.(2008).Processing idiomatic expressions:Effects of semantic compositionality.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,34(2),313-327.
Titone,D.A.,& Connine,C.M.(1999).On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomactic expressions.Journal of Pragmatic,31(2),1655-1674.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:2022年海军军医大学校级基础医学研究课题(2022QN029)。
通信作者:孙尔鸿,E-mail:seh0707@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2024-07-10