我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 “双危”还是“保护”?自我类别效价对刻板印象改变的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2024年03期
页码:
 257-263
栏目:
 人格与社会心理学
出版日期:
 2024-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Double Jeopardy or Protection?The Influence of the Self-Category's Valence on Stereotype Change
文章编号:
1003-5184(2024)03-0257-07
作者:
 魏谨1; 佐斌2
 (1.武汉城市职业学院旅游与酒店管理学院,武汉 430070; 2.中山大学心理学系,广州 510006)
Author(s):
 Wei Jin1; Zuo Bin2
 (1.School of Tourism and Hospitality Management,Wuhan City Polytechnic,Wuhan 430070; 2.Department of Psychology,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510006)
关键词:
 双危假说;  自我归类;  自我类别效价;  交叉分类;  刻板印象改变
Keywords:
 double jeopardy;  self-categorization;  valence of self-category;  cross-categorization;  stereotype change
分类号:
 B848
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 双危假说认为,与单一消极类别群体相比,人们对双消极类别群体的刻板印象改变更消极。为检验评价者自我类别效价是否构成双危假说的边界条件,研究1激活被试的消极类别来考察评价双方共享一个消极类别后的刻板印象改变,研究2情境化启动被试的现实类别以考察被试与双类别评价对象共享类别后的刻板印象改变。结果发现:(1)面对双消极类别群体,积极自我类别者的刻板印象改变恶化,表现出“双危”特征,消极自我类别者的刻板印象改变不显著,表现出“保护”特征。(2)消极自我类别评价者对双外积极群体的刻板印象改变更积极,积极自我类别评价者对与自己共享一个积极类别的双类别群体的刻板印象改变更积极。总的来说,刻板印象改变受到评价者自我类别效价的调节。
Abstract:
 The Double-jeopardy hypothesis posits that compared to a single negative social category group,people's stereotypes change more negatively towards dual negative category groups.In order to test whether the self-category valence of the evaluator constitutes a boundary condition for the Double-jeopardy Hypothesis,study 1 activated the negative category of the subjects to examine the change in stereotypes after both the evaluator and the target share a negative category,study 2 primed the subjects' real categories to examine the change in stereotypes after the subjects share a category with the dual-category target.The results found:(1)Facing dual negative category groups,the stereotype change of those with a positive self-category worsened,showing the “dual threat” characteristic,while the stereotype change of those with a negative self-category was not significant,showing a “protective” characteristic.(2)Evaluators with a negative self-category have a more positive change in stereotypes towards dual out-group positive groups,while evaluators with a positive self-category have a more positive change in stereotypes towards dual-category groups that share a positive category with themselves.Overall,stereotype change is moderated by the evaluator's self-category valence.

参考文献/References

 黎情,佐斌,胡聚平.(2009).群体交叉分类效应的代数模型及其潜在加工过程.心理科学进展,17(4),863-869.
李春,宫秀丽.(2006).自我分类理论概述.山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),51(3),157-160.
宋静静,佐斌,温芳芳,谭潇,赵苗苗.(2017).交叉分类对刻板印象的影响:穷富与年龄维度交叉为例.心理学探新,37(2),155-160.
严磊,佐斌,张艳红,吴漾,杨林川.(2018).交叉分类及其对刻板印象的影响.心理科学进展,26(7),1272-1283.
佐斌,温芳芳,吴漾,代涛涛.(2018).群际评价中热情与能力关系的情境演变:评价意图与结果的作用.心理学报,50(10),1180.
Abrams,D.,& Hogg,M.A.(1988).Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination.European Journal of Social Psychology,18(4),317-334.
Buchanan,N.T.,& Fitzgerald,L.F.(2008).Effects of racial and sexual harassment on work and the psychological well-being of African American women.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,13(2),137.
Chen,Y.,& Li,S.X.(2009).Group identity and social preferences.American Economic Review,99(1),431-457.
Coull,A.,Yzerbyt,V.Y.,Castano,E.,Paladino,M.-P.,& Leemans,V.(2001).Protecting the ingroup:Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening ingroup members.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,4(4),327-339.
Craig,B.M.,& Lipp,O.V.(2018).The influence of multiple social categories on emotion perception.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,75,27-35.
Damer,E.,Webb,T.L.,& Crisp,R.J.(2019).Diversity may help the uninterested:Evidence that exposure to counter-stereotypes promotes cognitive reflection for people low(but not high)in need for cognition.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,22(8),1079-1093.
Derous,E.,Ryan,A.M.,& Nguyen,H.H.D.(2012).Multiple categorization in resume screening:Examining effects on hiring discrimination against Arab applicants in field and lab settings.Journal of Organizational Behavior,33(4),544-570.
Doise,W.,Deschamps,J.-C.,& Meyer,G.(1978).The accentuation of intra-category similarities.Differentiation Between Social Groups.Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations,159-168.
Faul,F.,Erdfelder,E.,Buchner,A.,& Lang,A.-G.(2009).Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1:Tests for correlation and regression analyses.Behavior Research Methods,41(4),1149-1160.
Fiske,S.T.,Cuddy,A.J.,& Glick,P.(2007).Universal dimensions of social cognition:Warmth and competence.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(2),77-83.
Hogg,M.A.,Abrams,D.,& Brewer,M.B.(2017).Social identity:The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,20(5),570-581.
Hornsey,M.J.(2008).Social identity theory and self-categorization theory:A historical review.Social and Personality Psychology Compass,2(1),204-222.
Jost,J.T.,& Burgess,D.(2000).Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,26(3),293-305.
Jost,J.T.,Pelham,B.W.,& Carvallo,M.R.(2002).Non-conscious forms of system justification:Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,38(6),586-602.
Kang,S.K.,& Bodenhausen,G.V.(2015).Multiple identities in social perception and interaction:Challenges and opportunities.Annual Review of Psychology,66,547-574.
Owuamalam,C.K.,Rubin,M.,& Spears,R.(2019).Revisiting 25 years of system motivation explanation for system justification from the perspective of social identity model of system attitudes.British Journal of Social Psychology,58(2),362-381.
Puhl,R.M.,& Heuer,C.A.(2009).The stigma of obesity:A review and update.Obesity,17(5),941.
Rathje,S.,Van Bavel,J.J.,& Van Der Linden,S.(2021).Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,118(26),e2024292118.
Reynolds,K.J.,& Subasic,E.(2016).“We See Things Not as They Are,but as We Are”:Social Identity,Self-Categorization,and Perception.Psychological Inquiry,27(4),348-351.
Turner,J.C.(1999).Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories.Social Identity:Context,Commitment,Content,3(1),6-34.
Turner,J.C.,Hogg,M.A.,Oakes,P.J.,Reicher,S.D.,& Wetherell,M.S.(1987).Rediscovering the social group:A self-categorization theory.Basil Blackwell.
Turner,J.C.,Reynolds,K.J.,Van Lange,P.,Kruglanski,A.,& Higgins,E.T.(2012).Handbook of theories of social psychology.Sage Publications Ltd,London.
Turner,R.N.,& Crisp,R.J.(2010).Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice.British Journal of Social Psychology,49(1),129-142.
Turnley,W.H.,& Bolino,M.C.(2001).Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images:Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management.Journal of Applied Psychology,86(2),351.
Van Dommelen,A.,Schmid,K.,Hewstone,M.,Gonsalkorale,K.,& Brewer,M.(2015).Construing multiple ingroups:Assessing social identity inclusiveness and structure in ethnic and religious minority group members.European Journal of Social Psychology,45(3),386-399.
Woodhams,C.,Lupton,B.,& Cowling,M.(2015).The snowballing penalty effect:Multiple disadvantage and pay.British Journal of Management,26(1),63-77.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA331),湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究项目(23G120),武汉市教育科学规划重点项目(2022A084)资助。
通信作者:佐斌,E-mail:zuobin@mail.ccnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2024-07-10