我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 必要条件句的材料类型对其推理和可能性判断的影响(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2025年04期
页码:
 321-330
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2025-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Influence of Type of Materials on the Semantic Interpretation of Necessary Conditionals
文章编号:
1003-5184(2025)04-0321-10
作者:
 靳雨萱王墨耘
 (陕西师范大学心理学院,西安 710062)
Author(s):
 Jin Yuxuan Wang Moyun
 (School of Psychology,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710062)
关键词:
 必要条件句 材料类型 抽象材料 具体材料 语义相对性解释
Keywords:
 necessary conditionals type of materials abstract materials concrete materials the semantic relativity account
分类号:
 B842.5
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 作者分别用条件推理任务和可能性判断任务考察材料类型(抽象材料和具体材料)对必要条件句(只有p才q)语义理解的影响。以普通大学生为被试的实验结果发现,对抽象的必要条件句,两种任务的主导反应都表明p对q是必要且充分的; 对具体的必要条件句,两种任务的主导反应都表明p对q是必要但不充分的。两种任务一致表明对必要条件句的语义可能性理解和推理随材料类型变化而变化,是相对的。这支持作者提出的语义相对性解释,而非其他解释。
Abstract:
 Previous studies have usedconditional reasoning tasks and possibility judgment tasks to investigate the meanings of conditionals.People’s responses in these two tasks can reflect their readings of the semantic relationship between clauses in a conditional.Current research investigated whether type of materials influence the semantic reading of necessary conditionals(Only if p,q).The results are as follows.For the abstract necessary conditionals(ANC,e.g.,Only if the card is green,it is square.),most participants affirmed q from affirming p,and denied q from denying p in the conditional reasoning task,and judged cases pq and 䥺SymbolXC@ p 䥺SymbolXC@ q as possible in the possibility judgment task.For the concrete necessary conditionals(CNC,e.g.,Only if a man took the civil service exam,he is a civil servant.),most participants denied q from denying p,but didn’t affirm q from affirming p in the conditional reasoning task,and judged pq,p 䥺SymbolXC@ q,and 䥺SymbolXC@ p 䥺SymbolXC@ q as possible in the possibility judgment task.In each task,most participants interpreted ANCs as p being necessary and sufficient for q,but interpreted CNCs as p being necessary but not sufficient for q.This study found that type of materials affected the reading of necessary conditionals.The semantics of necessary conditionals are relative,depending on type of materials.Abstract necessary conditionals generally mean p being both necessary and sufficient for q,whereas concrete necessary conditionals generally mean p being necessary but not sufficient for q.This supports the author’s proposed semantic relativity account over alternative explanations.

参考文献/References

 顾本柏,罗俊龙,贾磊,索涛,张庆林.(2012).条件推理中否定前件下信念偏差发生阶段的ERP研究.心理科学,35(3),563-568.
胡笑羽,胡竹菁.(2020).条件推理:“演绎”与“概率”两种实验研究范式之比较.心理学探新,40(6),518-523.
王宝玺,向玲,张庆林.(2010).条件推理的抑制效应再探.心理科学,33(2),286-288.
曾晓青,陈美荣,胡竹菁.(2015).条件推理的社会契约理论研究述评.心理学探新,35(5),400-406.
Blochowiak,J.,Castelain,T.,Rodriguez-Villagra,O.A.,& Musolino,J.(2022).If and only if people were logical! The effect of pragmatic enrichment on reasoning with abstract and realistic materials.Journal of Pragmatics,197,137-158.
Cariani,F.,& Rips,L.J.(2023).Experimenting with(Conditional)Perfection:Tests of the Exhaustivity Theory.In S.Kaufmann,D.E.Over,& G.Sharma(Eds.),Conditionals.Palgrave Macmillan,Cham.
Egan,S.M.,García-Madruga,J.A.,& Byrne,R.M.(2009).Indicative and counterfactual ‘only if’ conditionals.Acta Psychologica,132(3),240-249.
Evans,J.S.B.(1977).Linguistic factors in reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29(2),297-306.
Evans,J.S.B.,Clibbens,J.,& Rood,B.(1995).Bias in conditional inference:Implications for mental models and mental logic.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48(3),644-670.
Evans,J.S.B.,Handley,S.J.,Neilens,H.,& Over,D.E.(2007).Thinking about conditionals:A study of individual differences.Memory & Cognition,35(7),1772-1784.
García-Madruga,J.A.,Carriedo,N.,& Moreno-Ríos,S.(2011).The semantics of ‘unless’ conditionals:Evidence from ‘unless’ and disjunctive inferences.The Spanish Journal of Psychology,14(2),569-579.
García-Madruga,J.A.,Carriedo,N.,Moreno-Ríos,S.,Gutiérrez,F.,& Schaeken,W.(2008).Unless reasoning.The Spanish Journal of Psychology,11(2),386-399.
García-Madruga,J.A.,Gutiérrez,F.,Carriedo,N.,Moreno-Ríos,S.,& Johnson-Laird,P.N.(2002).Mental Models in Deductive Reasoning.The Spanish Journal of Psychology,5(2),125-140.
Girotto,V.,Mazzocco,A.,& Tasso,A.(1997).The effect of premise order in conditional reasoning:A test of the mental model theory.Cognition,63(1),1-28.
Grosset,N.,& Barrouillet,P.(2003).On the nature of mental models of conditional:The case of if,if then,and Only if.Thinking & Reasoning,9(4),289-306.
Grusdt,B.,Liu,M.,& Franke,M.(2023).Testing the influence of QUDs on the occurrence of Conditional Perfection.Experiments in Linguistic Meaning,2,104-116.
Horn,L.R.(2000).From if toiff:Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening.Journal of Pragmatics,32(3),289-326.
Johnson-Laird,P.N.(2001).Mental models and deduction.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,5(10),434-442.
Johnson-Laird,P.N.,& Byrne,R.M.J.(2002).Conditionals:A theory of meaning,pragmatics,and inference.Psychological Review,109(4),646-678.
Johnson-Laird,P.N.,Byrne,R.M.,& Schaeken,W.(1992).Propositional reasoning by model.Psychological Review,99(3),418.
Kroeger,P.R.(2023).Analyzing meaning:An introduction to semantics and pragmatics.Language Science Press.
Markovits,H.,Thompson,V.A.,& Brisson,J.(2015).Metacognition and abstract reasoning. Memory & Cognition,43(4),681-693.
Manktelow,K.(2012). Thinking and reasoning:An introduction to the psychology of reason,judgment and decision making.Psychology Press.
Quelhas,A.C.,Johnson-Laird,P.N.,& Juhos,C.(2010).The modulation of conditional assertions and its effects on reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,63(9),1716-1739.
Santamaría,C.,& Espino,O.(2002).Conditionals and directionality:On the meaning of if vs.only if.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A,55(1),41-57.
Schroyens,W.(2010).A meta-analytic review of thinking about what is true,possible,and irrelevant in reasoning from or reasoning about conditional propositions.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,22(6),897-921.
Thompson,V.A.(1995).Conditional reasoning:The necessary and sufficient conditions.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49(1),1-60.
Thompson,V.A.,& Mann,J.M.(1995).Perceived necessity explains the dissociation between logic and meaning:The case of “Only If.”.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,21(6),1554-1567.
VanCanegem-Ardijns,I.,& Van Belle,W.(2008).Conditionals and types of conditional perfection.Journal of Pragmatics,40(2),349-376.
Verschueren,N.,Schaeken,W.,& Schroyens,W.(2006).Necessity and sufficiency in abstract conditional reasoning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,18(2),255-276.
Verschueren,N.,Schroyens,W.,Schaeken,W.,& d’Ydewalle,G.(2004).The interpretation of the concepts ‘necessity’and ‘sufficiency’in forward unicausal relations.Current Psychology letters.Behaviour,Brain & Cognition,14(3),1-18.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 通信作者:王墨耘,E-mail:wangmoyun@snnu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2025-08-30