我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 对齐探索性结构方程模型:多组探索性结构方程模型与对齐法的整合(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2025年04期
页码:
 370-377
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2025-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Aligned-Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling:Integration of Multiple-group ESEM and Alignment
文章编号:
1003-5184(2025)04-0370-08
作者:
 温聪聪1黄依梵2
 (1.厦门大学国际学院,厦门 361005; 2.厦门大学高等教育发展研究中心,厦门 361005)
Author(s):
 Wen Congcong1Huang Yifan2
 (1.International College,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005; 2.Center for Higher Education Development Research,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005)
关键词:
 多组探索性结构方程模型 对齐法 对齐探索性结构方程模型 测量不变性 多组比较
Keywords:
 multiple-group exploratory structural equation model alignment aligned exploratory structural equation model measurement invariance multiple-group comparison
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 当多组探索性结构方程模型中存在一定量的不等参数时,传统强测量不变性检验难以获取精确的截距和潜因子均值估计结果。而当传统对齐法模型中存在交叉载荷时,亦无法精确估计因子载荷、潜因子间协方差和潜因子均值等参数。文章系统阐述多组验证性因子分析、多组探索性结构方程模型、传统对齐法和对齐探索性结构方程模型的原理和运算过程,并总结了对齐探索性结构方程模型整合对齐法和多组探索性结构方程模型的优势:第一,有效绕开强测量不变性假设进行测量不变性检验和多组比较; 第二,基于模型度较好的形态不变模型进行建模; 第三,提供更精确的主载荷、交叉载荷、不等参数、潜因子间协方差、潜因子均值等参数估计; 第四,为模型中的参数不变性/不等性提供诊断。最后,以中国大学生职业价值观研究为例,演示在Mplus中对齐探索性结构方程模型的实现步骤,证实该方法在不满足强测量不变性条件下的适用性。
Abstract:
 When certain noninvariant parameters exist in multiple-group ESEM model,strong measurement invariance model struggles to yield precise estimates of intercepts and factor means.Conversely,traditional alignment method cannot accurately estimate factor loadings,factor covariances,or factor mean parameters when the model contains cross-loadings.This article systematically elaborates on the theoretical principles and computational procedures of multi-group CFA,multi-group ESEM,traditional alignment method,and aligned-ESEM.It summarizes the advantages of integrating the alignment method with multiple-group ESEM:bypassing the strong measurement invariance assumption for measurement invariance testing and multi-group comparisons; utilizing well-fitting configural invariance model for analysis; providing more accurate estimates of primary loadings,cross-loadings,noninvariant parameters,factor covariances,and factor means; and offering diagnostic insights into parameter-specific invariance/non-invariance within the model.Finally,using a study on work values among Chinese undergraduates as an example,the implementation steps of aligned-ESEM in Mplus are demonstrated,confirming the method’s applicability when strong measurement invariance conditions are unmet.

参考文献/References

 白新文,陈毅文.(2004).测量等价性的概念及其判定条件.心理科学进展,12(2),231-239.
刘军,吴维库.(2005).心理测量平衡性研究与实例.心理科学,28(1),170-174,169.
刘源,姚志晨.(2025).追踪研究中的趋势与动态:模型发展,整合与分化.心理科学进展,33(7),1181.
麦玉娇,温忠麟.(2013).探索性结构方程建模(ESEM):EFA 和 CFA 的整合.心理科学进展,21(5),934-939.
宋琼雅,张沥今,潘俊豪.(2021).贝叶斯多组比较:渐近测量不变性.心理学探新,41(1),69-75.
王孟成.(2014).潜变量建模与Mplus应用.重庆大学出版社.
王阳,温忠麟,付媛姝.(2020).等效性检验:结构方程模型评价和测量不变性分析的新视角.心理科学进展,28(11),1961-1969.
温聪聪,史秋衡.(2022).对齐法在单因子和三因子多组比较中允许的不等参数率.心理科学,45(5),1230-1242.
温聪聪,伍伟平,林光杰.(2019).对齐(Alignment):一种新的多群组分析法.心理科学进展,27(1),181-189.
Asparouhov,T.,& Muthén,B.(2009).Exploratory structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,16(3),397-438.
Asparouhov,T.,& Muthén,B.(2014).Multiple-group factor analysis alignment.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,21(4),495-508.
Asparouhov,T.,& Muthén,B.(2023).Multiple group alignment for exploratory and structural equation models.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,30(2),169-191.
Davidov,E.,Meuleman,B.,Cieciuch,J.,Schmidt,P.,& Billiet,J.(2014).Measurement equivalence in cross-national research.Annual Review of Sociology,40,55-75.
Deng,L.,& Yuan,K.-H.(2016).Comparing latent means without mean structure models:A projection-based approach.Psychometrika,81,802-829.
Jiang,G.,Mai,Y.J.,& Yuan,K.H.(2017).Advances in measurement invariance and mean comparison of latent variables:Equivalence testing and a projection-based approach.Frontiers in Psychology,8,Article 1823.
Maltese,A.V.,Ross,H.,Wang,L.,& Wang,Y.(2014).Assessing Multinational Interest in STEM:Implementing a Comparative Survey Research Study in China.International Journal of Chinese Education,3(1),109-131.
Marsh,H.W.,Lüdtke,O.,Nagengast,B.,Morin,A.J.,& Von Davier,M.(2013).Why item parcels are(almost)never appropriate:Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models.Psychological methods,18(3),257.
Millsap,R.E.(2012).Statistical approaches to measurement invariance.Routledge.
Muthén,B.,& Asparouhov,T.(2012).Bayesian structural equation modeling:A more flexible representation of substantive theory.Psychological Methods,17(3),313.
Muthén,B.,& Asparouhov,T.(2018).Recent methods for the study of measurement invariance with many groups:Alignment and random effects.Sociological Methods & Research,47(4),637-664.
Muthén,L.K.,& Muthén,B.(2002).How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power.Structural Equation Modeling,9(4),599-620.
Nagengast,B.,& Marsh,H.W.(2013).Motivation and engagement in science around the globe:Testing measurement invariance with multigroup structural equation models across 57 countries using PISA 2006.In L.Rutkowski,M.von Davier,& D.Rutkowski(Eds.),Handbook of international large-scale assessment:Background,technical issues,and methods of data analysis(pp.317-344).CRC Press.
Rutkowski,L.,& Svetina,D.(2014).Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys.Educational and Psychological Measurement,74(1),31-57.
Wen,C.,& Hu,F.(2022).Investigating the Applicability of Alignment—A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.Frontiers in Psychology,13,1-13.
Zercher,F.,Schmidt,P.,Cieciuch,J.,& Davidov,E.(2015).The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey:Exact vs.Approximate measurement invariance.Frontiers in Psychology,13,1-13.
Zercher,F.,Schmidt,P.,Cieciuch,J.,& Davidov,E.(2015).The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey:Exact vs.Approximate measurement invariance.Article 733.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:2024年度福建省教育系统哲学社会科学研究项目(JSZF24001)。
通信作者:黄依梵,E-mail:yifanhuang@xmu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2025-08-30