可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:
白新文,陈毅文.(2004).测量等价性的概念及其判定条件.心理科学进展,12(2),231-239.
刘军,吴维库.(2005).心理测量平衡性研究与实例.心理科学,28(1),170-174,169.
刘源,姚志晨.(2025).追踪研究中的趋势与动态:模型发展,整合与分化.心理科学进展,33(7),1181.
麦玉娇,温忠麟.(2013).探索性结构方程建模(ESEM):EFA 和 CFA 的整合.心理科学进展,21(5),934-939.
宋琼雅,张沥今,潘俊豪.(2021).贝叶斯多组比较:渐近测量不变性.心理学探新,41(1),69-75.
王孟成.(2014).潜变量建模与Mplus应用.重庆大学出版社.
王阳,温忠麟,付媛姝.(2020).等效性检验:结构方程模型评价和测量不变性分析的新视角.心理科学进展,28(11),1961-1969.
温聪聪,史秋衡.(2022).对齐法在单因子和三因子多组比较中允许的不等参数率.心理科学,45(5),1230-1242.
温聪聪,伍伟平,林光杰.(2019).对齐(Alignment):一种新的多群组分析法.心理科学进展,27(1),181-189.
Asparouhov,T.,& Muthén,B.(2009).Exploratory structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,16(3),397-438.
Asparouhov,T.,& Muthén,B.(2014).Multiple-group factor analysis alignment.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,21(4),495-508.
Asparouhov,T.,& Muthén,B.(2023).Multiple group alignment for exploratory and structural equation models.Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,30(2),169-191.
Davidov,E.,Meuleman,B.,Cieciuch,J.,Schmidt,P.,& Billiet,J.(2014).Measurement equivalence in cross-national research.Annual Review of Sociology,40,55-75.
Deng,L.,& Yuan,K.-H.(2016).Comparing latent means without mean structure models:A projection-based approach.Psychometrika,81,802-829.
Jiang,G.,Mai,Y.J.,& Yuan,K.H.(2017).Advances in measurement invariance and mean comparison of latent variables:Equivalence testing and a projection-based approach.Frontiers in Psychology,8,Article 1823.
Maltese,A.V.,Ross,H.,Wang,L.,& Wang,Y.(2014).Assessing Multinational Interest in STEM:Implementing a Comparative Survey Research Study in China.International Journal of Chinese Education,3(1),109-131.
Marsh,H.W.,Lüdtke,O.,Nagengast,B.,Morin,A.J.,& Von Davier,M.(2013).Why item parcels are(almost)never appropriate:Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models.Psychological methods,18(3),257.
Millsap,R.E.(2012).Statistical approaches to measurement invariance.Routledge.
Muthén,B.,& Asparouhov,T.(2012).Bayesian structural equation modeling:A more flexible representation of substantive theory.Psychological Methods,17(3),313.
Muthén,B.,& Asparouhov,T.(2018).Recent methods for the study of measurement invariance with many groups:Alignment and random effects.Sociological Methods & Research,47(4),637-664.
Muthén,L.K.,& Muthén,B.(2002).How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power.Structural Equation Modeling,9(4),599-620.
Nagengast,B.,& Marsh,H.W.(2013).Motivation and engagement in science around the globe:Testing measurement invariance with multigroup structural equation models across 57 countries using PISA 2006.In L.Rutkowski,M.von Davier,& D.Rutkowski(Eds.),Handbook of international large-scale assessment:Background,technical issues,and methods of data analysis(pp.317-344).CRC Press.
Rutkowski,L.,& Svetina,D.(2014).Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys.Educational and Psychological Measurement,74(1),31-57.
Wen,C.,& Hu,F.(2022).Investigating the Applicability of Alignment—A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.Frontiers in Psychology,13,1-13.
Zercher,F.,Schmidt,P.,Cieciuch,J.,& Davidov,E.(2015).The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey:Exact vs.Approximate measurement invariance.Frontiers in Psychology,13,1-13.
Zercher,F.,Schmidt,P.,Cieciuch,J.,& Davidov,E.(2015).The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey:Exact vs.Approximate measurement invariance.Article 733.