我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 大学生亲社会支出量表的编制及信效度检验(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2025年03期
页码:
 266-272
栏目:
 
出版日期:
 2025-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Development and Validation of the College Student Prosocial Spending Scale
文章编号:
1003-5184(2025)03-0266-07
作者:
 邝可欣1; 3; 龙慧芳2; 3; 林 苹4; 5; 王 阳3; 周 蕾6
 (1.香港教育大学教育及人类发展学院,香港 999077; 2.华南师范大学心理学院,广州 510631; 3.广东金融学院心理与创业教育学院,广州 510521; 4.广东金融学院清远校区管理委员会,清远 511510; 5.广州大学教育学院,广州 510006; 6.广州科技职业技术大学基础部,广州 510550)
Author(s):
 Kuang Kexin1; 3; Long Huifang2; 3; Lin Ping4; 5; Wang Yang3; Zhou Lei6
 (1.Faculty of Education and Human Development,The Education University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077; 2.School of Psychology,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631; 3.School of Psychology and Entrepreneurship Education,Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou 510521; 4.Qingyuan Campus Management Committee,Guangdong University of Finance,Qingyuan 511510; 5.School of Education,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006; 6.Department of Basic Courses,Guangzhou Vocational University of Science and Technology,Guangzhou 510550)
关键词:
 亲社会支出;  亲社会行为;  信度;  效度
Keywords:
 prosocial spending;  prosocial behavior;  reliability;  validity
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 编制大学生亲社会支出量表(College Student Prosocial Spending Scale,CSPSS)并检验其信效度。通过文献分析和访谈等方法形成初始量表; 选取550名大学生进行预测试,549名大学生进行正式施测。CSPSS包含公益型和关系型2个维度,共14个条目。两因子模型拟合良好(χ2/df=2.75,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.05); 总量表和各维度的α系数均高于0.80。CSPSS与自尊不稳定性、抑郁、焦虑和压力负相关,与亲社会行为、基本心理需求满足及自尊正相关; 控制亲社会行为后,亲社会支出对基本心理需求满足、自尊、自尊不稳定性和抑郁仍有额外影响。综上,CSPSS信效度良好,可作为亲社会支出的有效测评工具。
Abstract:
 The objective of this study was to develop the College Student Prosocial Spending Scale(CSPSS)and test its reliability and validity.The initial scale was formed through methods such as literature analysis and interviews.550 college students were selected for the preliminary test and another 549 college students for the formal test.CSPSS has 14 items and two dimensions of Commonweal and Relationship.Results from the Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA)confirmed the CSPSS two-factor structure and the model revealed an acceptable fit to the data(χ2/df=2.75,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,RMSEA=0.06,SRMR=0.05).The Cronbach’s α coefficients of CSPSS and each dimension were higher than 0.80.Scores of Perceived Self-Esteem Instability Measure(P-SEI)and Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale(DASS-21)were inversely correlated with CSPSS,while CSPSS was significantly positive with scores of Prosocial Tendencies Measure(PTM),SDT Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale(SDTBPNS)and Global Self-Esteem Measure(GSEM).Taking prosocial behavior as the control variable,prosocial spending still had an extra effect on the basic psychological needs satisfaction,self-esteem,perceived self-esteem instability,and depression.Consequently,the CSPSS met the psychometric standards and it could be used to measure the prosocial spending of college students.

参考文献/References

 陈健平.(2016).亲社会行为研究综述.青春岁月,(10),413.
丛文君.(2008).大学生亲社会行为类型的研究(硕士学位论文).南京师范大学.
崔馨月,李斌,贺汝婉,张淑颖,雷励.(2021).亲社会支出对主观幸福感的影响及其作用机制.心理科学进展,29(7),1279-1290.
杜健,加藤和生,小林美绪.(2020).自我决定理论基本心理需要满足量表中文版在大学生中的信效度检验.中国健康心理学杂志,28(2),218-221.
龚栩,谢熹瑶,徐蕊,罗悦嘉.(2010).抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告.中国临床心理学杂志,18(4),443-446.
胡杨.(2017).自主性动机和控制性动机引发的亲社会支出对幸福感的影响(硕士学位论文).山东师范大学,济南.
寇彧,洪慧芳,谭晨,李磊.(2007).青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订.心理发展与教育,23(1),112-117.
寇彧,王磊.(2003).儿童亲社会行为及其干预研究述评.心理发展与教育,19(4),86-91.
寇彧,张庆鹏.(2006).青少年亲社会行为的概念表征研究.社会学研究,(5),169-187.
陆思宇.(2021).高校学生慈善公益行为影响因素研究(硕士学位论文).云南财经大学.
罗胜强,姜嬿.(2014).管理学问卷调查研究方法.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
邵立人.(2019).消费升级语境下的公益消费结构浅析.传播力研究,3(31),183-186,188.
汪向东,王希林,马弘.(1999).心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).中国心理卫生杂志社.
王阳,温忠麟,李伟,方杰.(2022).新世纪20年国内结构方程模型方法研究与模型发展.心理科学进展,30(8),1715-1733.
温忠麟,谢晋艳,方杰,王一帆.(2022).新世纪 20 年国内假设检验及其关联问题的方法学研究.心理科学进展,30(8),1667-1681.
吴明隆.(2010).问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
Aknin,L.B.,Dunn,E.W.,Proulx,J.,Lok,I.,& Norton,M.I.(2020).Does spending money on others promote happiness?A registered replication report.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,119(2),e15.
Barrett,L.,Dunbar,R.,& Lycett,J.(2002).Human evolutionary psychology.Princeton University Press.
Carlo,G.,& Randall,B.A.(2002).The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,31(1),31-44.
Dunn,E.W.,Aknin,L.B.,& Norton,M.I.(2008).Spending money on others promotes happiness.Science,319(5870),1687-1688.
Eisenberg,N.,& Miller,P.A.(1987).The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors.Psychological Bulletin,101(1),91-119.
Falk,A.,& Graeber,T.(2020).Delayed negative effects of prosocial spending on happiness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,117(12),6463-6468.
Howard,M.C.(2019).The measurement,nomological net,and theory of perceived self-esteem instability:Applying the conservation of resources theory to understand the construct. Psychological Reports,122(3),1007-1042.
Kazdin,& Alan,E.(2009).Psychological science’s contributions to a sustainable environment:Extending our reach to a grand challenge of society.American Psychologist,64(5),339-356.
Khan,D.,& Siddiqui,D.A.(2021).The effect of pro-social spending on well-being,Happiness,and Psychological Need Satisfaction in Pakistan:The complementary role of Self-enhancement and Self-transcendence.SSRN Electronic Journal.
Lara,B.,Aknin,Gillian,M.,& Sandstrom,et al.(2011).It’s the recipient that counts:Spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties.PloS One,6(2),e17018.
Whillans,A.V.,Dunn,E.W.,Sandstrom,G.M.,Dickerson,S.S.,& Madden,K.M.(2016).Is spending money on others good for your heart?Health Psychology,35(6),574-583.
Zhang,W.,Pan,J.,Liu,J.,Zhang,Y.,& Chen,M.(2020).Recipients’ happiness in prosocial spending:The role of social ties.Journal of Consumer Affairs,55(4),1333-1351.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(23YJC190026),广东省普通高校重点领域专项(服务“百千万工程”)(2024ZDZX4054),广东省高校思想政治教育课题(2024GXSZ154)。
通信作者:王阳,E-mail:ywang316@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2025-06-20