我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 社会性奖赏问卷在大学生群体中的修订及应用(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2023年06期
页码:
 567-574
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2023-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Revision and Application of Social Reward Questionnaire in College Students
文章编号:
1003-5184(2023)06-0567-08
作者:
 高汉培1; 黄宇辰2; 周广东1; 3; 4; 纪 旭1; 乔雅静1; 孙 艳2
 (1.天津师范大学心理学部,天津 300387; 2.北京大学中国药物依赖性研究所,北京 100191; 3.教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津300387; 4.学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津 300387)
Author(s):
 Gao Hanpei1; Huang Yuchen2; Zhou Guangdong1; 3; 4; Ji Xu1; Qiao Yajing1; Sun Yan2
 (1.Faculty of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387; 2.National Institute on Drug Dependence,Peking University,Beijing 100191; 3.Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education,Academy of Psychology and Behavior,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387; 4.Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students' Mental Development and Learning,Tianjin 300387)
关键词:
 社会性奖赏问卷;  SRQ;  信度;  效度;  大学生
Keywords:
 social rewards questionnaire;  SRQ;  reliability;  validity;  college students
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 目的:在中国大学生群体中进行翻译并修订社会性奖赏问卷(Social Reward Questionnaire,SRQ),据此考察中国大学生的社会性奖赏水平。方法:采用方便取样法和滚雪球抽样法调查8275名大学生,以此来检验SRQ的问卷结构,并以大五人格简式版(Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version,CBF-PI-B)的开放性、外向性、神经质维度以及奖励与惩罚敏感性问卷(The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire,SPSRQ)作为效标进行效度检验。结果:经分析后,中文版SRQ保留了原问卷的钦佩性、负性社交效价、被动性、社交性、性关系的五因素结构,共21条目,每个维度3～7个条目,累积方差解释率65.66%,各个因子的因子载荷为0.62～0.86。CFA结果为RMSEA=0.047,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,SRMR=0.047。SRQ总分及分维度的内部一致性信度为0.70～0.88、分半信度为0.71～0.89、重测信度(ICC)为0.75～0.94,问卷在不同性别学生之间具有完全的测量等值性(ΔCFI<0.01,ΔRMSEA<0.01)。结论:修订后的SRQ中文版具有较好的信度和效度,是测量中国大学生群体社会性奖赏的合适工具。
Abstract:
 Objective:The Social Reward Questionnaire(SRQ)is to be translated and revised among Chinese college students,based on which the social reward level of Chinese college students is to be investigated.Method:The convenient sampling method and snowball sampling method were used to investigate 8275 college students to test the SRQ questionnaire structure.Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version(CBF-PI-B),The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire(SPSRQ)as a criterion for validity test.Results:After three exploratory factor analyses,the Chinese SRQ retained the five-factor structure of admiration,negative social titer,passivity,sociability and sexual relationship of the original questionnaire,with a total of 21 items with 3-7 items per dimension,cumulative variance explanation rate 65.66%,and the factor load of each factor ranges from 0.62 to 0.86.The CFA results were RMSEA=0.047,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,SRMR=0.047.The internal consistency reliability of SRQ total score and fractal dimension is 0.70～0.88,split half reliability is 0.71～0.89,retest reliability(ICC)is 0.75～0.94,and the questionnaire has complete measurement equivalence between different genders(ΔCFI<0.01,ΔRMSEA<0.01).Conclusion:The revised Chinese version of SRQ has good reliability and validity,and is a suitable tool to measure the social reward of Chinese college students.

参考文献/References

 陈晓科,李祚山,王婧.(2021).困境儿童孤独与社交焦虑对抑郁的影响——自尊的中介作用.心理科学,44(1),6.
郭永香,宋广文,赵平平,马玉花.(2011).大学生惩罚和奖励敏感性问卷(spsrq)的修订.济南职业学院学报,(1),5.
高聪,于丽玲.(2020).强化敏感性理论研究及其在医疗职业风险感知中的应用展望.中国社会医学杂志,37(1),5.
李霞,秦浩轩,曾美红,何玉雪,马梦珍.(2021).大学生短视频成瘾症状与人格的关系.中国心理卫生杂志,35(11),925-928.
吕房艳.(2016).社会奖赏预期对大学生职业选择风险偏向的影响(硕士学位论文).福建师范大学.
吕房艳,谭敬斌,徐鹏飞,熊希灵,金泽慧,高定国.(2021).社会性奖赏及其作用的神经机制.应用心理学,(3),189-203.
李文迪.(2016).大学生强化敏感性、自我控制与网络成瘾的关系研究(硕士学位论文).华中师范大学.
聂余峰.(2022).网络游戏成瘾的社会奖赏功能失调及其认知神经机制(博士学位论文).华中师范大学.
王璇,王玲玲,严超.(2018).基于社会性奖赏期待的精神分裂个体诊断.(Eds.).第二十一届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(pp.579-580).
王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥.(2011).中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ:简式版的制定及信效度检验.中国临床心理学杂志,(4),454-457.
王欢,黄海,吴和鸣.(2014).大学生人格特征与手机依赖的关系:社交焦虑的中介作用.中国临床心理学杂志,(3),447-450.
王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥.(2010).中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅰ:理论框架与信度分析.中国临床心理学杂志,(5),545-548.
王孟成.(2014).潜变量建模与Mplus应用·基础篇.重庆大学出版社.
徐慧,黄俊,王滔.(2021).自闭症谱系障碍个体社会奖赏加工缺陷的神经机制.中国特殊教育,(3),39-45.
徐延辉,孔一舟.(2023).转型时期中国社会公平感的变迁历程及其解释因素.社会,(3),213-242.
杨玲,张炀,张建勋,陈开林.(2020).海洛因戒断者对金钱和社会奖赏的敏感性.中国心理卫生杂志,(11),926-931.
Buss,A.H.(1983).Social rewards and personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(3).
Dölen,G.,Darvishzadeh,A.,Huang,K.W.,& Malenka,R.C.(2013).Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin.Nature,501(7466),179-184.
Davis,C.,Patte,K.,Levitan,R.,Reid,C.,Tweed,S.,& Curtis,C.(2007).From motivation to behaviour:A model of reward sensitivity,overeating,and food preferences in the risk profile for obesity.Appetite,48(1),12-19.
Foa,E.B.,& Foa,U.G.(2012).“Resource theory of social exchange,”In K.Tornblom & A.Kazemi(Eds.),Handbookof social resource theory(pp.15-32).New York,NY:Springer.
Foa,E.B.,& Foa,U.G.(1980).Resource theory:Interpersonal behaviour asexchange.In K.J.Gergen,M.S.Greenberg,& R.H.Willis(Eds.),Social exchange:Advances in theory and research(pp.77-94).New York,NY:Plenum Press.
Foa,E.B.,& Foa,U.G.(1980).Resource theory.In K.J.Gergen,M.S.Greenberg,& R.H.Willis(Eds.),Social exchange(pp.77-94).Springer,Boston,MA.4.
Foa,E.B.,& Foa,U.G.(1980).Resource Theory.In K.J.Gergen.M.S.Greenberg.R.H.Willis.(Eds.),Social exchange(pp.77-94).Springer,Boston,MA.
Foulkes,L.,Viding,E.,McCrory,E.,& Neumann,C.S.(2014).Social Reward Questionnaire(SRQ):Development and validation.Frontiers in Psychology,5,201.
Foulkes,L.,Neumann,C.S.,Roberts,R.,McCrory,E.,& Viding,E.(2017).Social Reward Questionnaire-Adolescent Version and its association with callous-unemotional traits.Royal Society Open Science,4(4),160991.
Gable,S.L.(2006).Approach and avoidance social motives and goals.Journal of Personality,74(1),175-222.
Godfrey,K.J.,Foulkes,L.,McMorris,C.,Harris,A.D.,& Bray,S.(2023).Development and validation of the Social Reward Questionnaire-Early Childhood.Psychological Assessment,35(3),229-241.
Grouzet,F.M.,Kasser,T.,Ahuvia,A.,Dols,J.M.,Kim,Y.,Lau,S.,Ryan,R.M.,Saunders,S.,Schmuck,P.,& Sheldon,K.M.(2005).The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,89(5),800-816.
Izuma,K.,Saito,D.N.,& Sadato,N.(2008).Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum.Neuron,58(2),284-294.
Kaiser,H.F.(1974).An Index of Factorial Simplicity.Psychometrika,39(1),31-36.
Kessler,L.,Hewig,J.,Weichold,K.,Silbereisen,R.K.,& Miltner,W.H.(2017).Feedback negativity and decision-making behavior in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task(BART)in adolescents is modulated by peer presence.Psychophysiology,54(2),260-269.
McCollum,D.L.(2009).What are the social values of college students?a social goals approach.Journal of College & Character,6(6),1-21.
Meshi,D.,Turel,O.,& Henley,D.(2020).Snapchat vs.Facebook:Differences in problematic use,behavior change attempts,and trait social reward preferences.Addictive Behaviors Reports,12,100294.
Neumann,C.S.,Hare,R.D.,& Pardini,D.A.(2015).Antisociality and the Construct of Psychopathy:Data From Across the Globe.Journal of Personality,83(6),678-692.
Rademacher,L.,Schulte-Rüther,M.,Hanewald,B.,& Lammertz,S.(2017).Reward:From Basic Reinforcers to Anticipation of Social Cues.Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences,30,207-221.
Rawas,R.,Amaral,I.M.,& Hofer,A.(2020).Social interaction reward:A resilience approach to overcome vulnerability to drugs of abuse.European Neuropsychopharmacology:The Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology,37,12-28.
Satterthwaite,T.D.,Ruparel,K.,Loughead,J.,Elliott,M.A.,Gerraty,R.T.,Calkins,M.E.,Hakonarson,H.,Gur,R.C.,Gur,R.E.,& Wolf,D.H.(2012).Being right is its own reward:Load and performance related ventral striatum activation to correct responses during a working memory task in youth.NeuroImage,61(3),723-729.
Shahrabi,A.A.M.,Nasiri,F.S.M.,Pakdaman,S.,Sadatian,S.M.,& Madani,F.S.(2017).A study on factor structure and validation of social reward questionnaire in Iranian Youth.Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences,11(3),96-100.
Smeijers,D.,Uzieblo,K.,Glennon,J.C.,Driessen,J.M.A.,& Brazil,I.A.(2021).Examining individual differences in social reward valuation:A person-based approach.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment,44,312-325.
Vernetti,A.,Senju,A.,Charman,T.,Johnson,M.H.,& Gliga,T.(2018).Simulating interaction:Using gaze-contingent eye-tracking to measure the reward value of social signals in toddlers with and without autism.Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience,29,21-29.
Wang,D.,Liu,T.,& Shi,J.(2017).Development of monetary and social reward processes.Scientific Reports,7(1),11128.
Yang,L.,Zhang,Y.,Zhang,J.,Li,N.,& Chen,Z.(2022).Altered neural processing of social reward in male heroin abstainers.International Journal of Psychophysiology:Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology,176,142-148.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:科技部科技创新2030(2022ZD0211200)。
通讯作者:周广东,E-mail:zhouguangdong@tjnu.edu.cn; 孙艳,E-mail:sunyan@bjmu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update:  2023-12-20