我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

 中文版婴儿态度量表在已婚育龄女性中的信效度检验(PDF)

《心理学探新》[ISSN:1003-5184/CN:36-1228/B]

期数:
 2022年05期
页码:
 475-482
栏目:
 心理统计与测量
出版日期:
 2022-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Attitudes Toward Babies Scale in Married Women of Childbearing Age
文章编号:
1003-5184(2022)05-0475-06
作者:
 郄亚男 吴小勇
 (贵州中医药大学人文与管理学院,贵阳 550025)
Author(s):
 Qie Yanan Wu Xiaoyong
 (School of Humanities and Management,Guiyang University of TCM,Guiyang 550025)
关键词:
 婴儿态度;  婴儿兴趣;  育龄女性;  信度;  效度
Keywords:
 attitude toward babies;  interest in infants;  childbearing age;  reliability;  validity
分类号:
 B841.2
DOI:
 -
文献标识码:
 A
摘要:
 目的 将婴儿态度量表(Attitude Toward Babies Scale,ABS)进行汉化,并检验在中国已婚育龄女性中的信效度。方法 采用方便取样的方法,选取贵州、山西、湖北等地的700名育龄女性进行施测,通过项目分析、内容效度分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、效标关联效度、Cronbach α系数、分半信度、重测信度评价其信效度。结果 项目分析表明,婴儿态度量表各条目与量表各维度总分显著相关,具有良好的区分度; 内容效度分析表明专家间一致性水平(IR)为1,I-CVI在0.83～1之间,S-CVI/UA为0.82,S-CVI/Ave为0.97; 探索性因素分析得出5个特征值>1的因子,累计方差贡献率为54.399%; 验证性因素分析表明五因素模型拟合度较好(χ2/df=2.500,CFI=0.922,TLI=0.914,RMSEA=0.048,SRMR=0.050); 各效标与该量表显著相关; 总量表Cronbach α系数为0.748,量表的分半信度为0.661,重测信度为0.639。结论 修订后的ABS具有良好的信效度,可以作为已婚育龄女性生育动机的有效测量工具。
Abstract:
 Objective To translate the Attitude Toward Babies Scale(ABS)into Chinese and test its reliability and validity in Chinese married women of childbearing age.Methods Totally 700 married women of childbearing age in Guizhou,Shanxi,Hubei and other places were test through convenient sampling methods.Project analysis,Content validity analysis,exploratory factor analysis,confirmatory factor analysis,criterion correlation validity,Cronbach α coefficient,split half Reliability and test-retest reliability evaluate its reliability and validity.Results Item analysis showed that each item of ABS was significantly correlated with the total score of each dimension of the scale,which had good discrimination; Content validity analysis shows that the consistency level between experts was 1,I-CVI was between 0.83 and 1,S-CVI/UA was 0.82,and S-CVI/AVE was 0.97; Exploratory factor analysis showed that there were five factors with eigenvalue >1,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 54.399%; Confirmatory factor analysis identified a five factor model(χ2/df=2.500,CFI=0.922,TLI=0.914,RMSEA=0.048,SRMR=0.050); The ABS was of good criterion-related validity; The Cronbach's α coefficient for the total scale was 0.748,and the Cronbach's αcoefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.626 to 0.925,the split-half reliability of the scale is 0.661,and the test-retest reliability were 0.639.Conclusion The revised Chinese version of ABS has good reliability and validity,which can be used as an effective indicator to measure the attitude toward babies of married women in childbearing age.

参考文献/References

 陈春棉,姜德国,陈策,马晓燕,毛富强.(2020).格拉斯哥抗精神病药副反应评定量表中文版信效度分析.中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,29(1),79-83.
风笑天.(2017).当代中国人的生育意愿:我们实际上知道多少?社会科学,444(8),59-71.
谭雪萍.(2015).成本-效用视角下的单独二胎生育意愿影响因素研究——基于徐州市单独家庭的调查.南方人口,30(2),1-12.
吴小勇,毕重增.(2018).人格特征会影响中国人的生育行为吗?——基于CGSS(2013)数据的分析.人口学刊,40(4),31-42.
吴明隆.(2011).结构方程模型AMOS的操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
温忠麟,黄彬彬,汤丹丹.(2018).问卷数据建模前传.心理科学,41(1),204-210.
王晓娇,夏海鸥.(2016).基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用.护理学杂志,31(7),61-63.
杨柳青,郝志红.(2020).Fischer就医态度量表的汉化及信效度分析.中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,29(8),757-762.
Adair,L.E.,Brase,G.L.,Akao,K.,& Jantsch,M.(2014).Babyfever:Social and media influences on fertility desires.Personality and Individual Differences,71,135-139.
Ajzen,I.,& Klobas,J.(2013).Fertility intentions:An approach based on the theory of planned behavior.Demographic Research,29,203-232.
Brase,G.L.,& Brase,S.L.(2012).Emotional regulation of fertility decision making:What is the nature and structure of “baby fever”?Emotion,12(5),1141-1154.
Brase,G.L.(2016).The relationship between positive and negative attitudes towards children and reproductive intentions.Personality and Individual Differences,90,143-149.
Clutterbuck,S.,Adams,J.,& Nettle,D.(2014).Childhood adversity accelerates intended reproductive timing in adolescent girls without increasing interest in infants.PLoS One,9(1),e85013.
Charles,N.E.,Alexander,G.M.,& Saenz,J.(2013).Motivational value and salience of images of infants.Evolution and Human Behavior,34(5),373-381.
Cheng,G.,Zhang,D.,Sun,Y.,Jia,Y.,& Ta,N.(2015).Childless adults with higher secure attachment state have stronger parenting motivation.Personality and Individual Differences,87,39-44.
Ding,F.,Cheng,G.,Jia,Y.,Zhang,W.,Lin,N.,Zhang,D.,& Mo,W.(2020).The role of sex and femininity in preferences for unfamiliar infants among Chinese adults.Plos One,15(11),e0242203.
Maestripieri,D.,& Pelka,S.(2002).Sex differences in interest in infants across the lifespan:A biological adaptation for parenting?Human Nature,13(3),327-344.
Matysiak,A.,& Nitsche,N.(2016).Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences:An interdisciplinary,searchable,and linkable resource.John Wiley & Sons,Inc.
Sinisalo,H.,Bakermans-Kranenburg,M.J.,& Peltola,M.J.(2022).Hormonal and behavioral responses to an infant simulator in women with and without children.Developmental Psychobiology,64,e22321.
Tate,D.P.,& Patterson,C.J.(2019).Sexual minority women's attitudes toward infants,children,and parenthood.Journal of Lesbian Studies,23(4),464-475.
Yaakobi,E.,Mikulincer,M.,& Shaver,P.R.(2014).Parenthood as a terror management mechanism:The moderating role of attachment orientations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,40(6),762-774.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:贵州省哲学社会科学规划课题(21GZZD44)。
通讯作者:吴小勇,E-mail:94014365@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update:  2022-10-20